Are Speaking in Tongues and Word of Prophecy Real?

 

 Are Speaking in Tongues and Word of Prophecy Real?

None of what I say below has anything to do with the disreputable Charles Fox Parham or Williaam Seymour, or the false prophets, or the tongues as the “initial evidence of the Holy Spirit” (a false, or non-Biblical doctrine of Pentacostalism) or the false sign of “writing in tongues.”

Nevertheless, let’s look at what the Bible says.

The Holy Spirit gives each of His children at least one of nine gifts, listed in I Corinthians 12:7-11:

But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all: 8 for to one is given the word of wisdom through the Spirit, to another the word of knowledge through the same Spirit, 9 to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healings by the same Spirit, 10 to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another discerning of spirits, to another different kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. 11 But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually as He wills.

Let’s discuss two of the most controversial ones: tongues and prophecy, so-called “sign” gifts. When the charismatic wave hit the U.S. in the early 1980s, much ink was spilled back and forth in controversy. You could say I’m 40 years too late on this, but the subject was raised in an excellent book I read: The Supernatural Worldview, by Cris Putnam, published 2014. So let’s have a go at it.

The biggest outcry against the use of the sign gifts was by conservative, Bible-believing churches. In the 1980s, I broke away from my Baptist roots and joined a charismatic church. My former pastor didn’t have a kind word for me after that, saying that what I was hearing in interpretation of tongues-speaking was from the devil. I must say, though, I learned much in the new church—particularly in small groups, where we were encouraged to be accountable, and to listen to what people in the group were saying to us.  They did actually encourage and admonish us--gently, but they actually did it.  I learned about my weaknesses, my strengths, my gifts--and found mine. I used it a couple times there, and was respected. We also had a strong educational emphasis as well. That was unexpected, since I knew that the charismatic churches have been accused of emphasizing emotion instead of intellect. But from what I observed, tongues were followed by interpretation, prophecies were judged to see if they were Scriptural; it seemed to be an orderly setting.

The theology that the non-believers in sign-gifts came up with to support their view is called “cessationism.” They maintain that (1) the Holy Spirit’s purpose for the sign gifts was finished in the first century, with an influx of new believers for a “starter” church; (2) the sign gifts were given to the twelve apostles; and (3) the gift of apostleship no longer exists. One of their favorite proof texts is I Corinthians 13:8-11:

Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part. 10 But when that which is perfect has come, then that which is in part will be done away. 11 When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 12 For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know just as I also am known.

The cessationists believe tongues and prophecy are ways “progressive” churches want to hear “new” doctrines from the Lord, but then any new ideas they get opens these churches to deception and manipulation. My personal experience wasn’t that way—although it’s certainly possible it did happen elsewhere that way. I heard of extremes, and saw some on TV--and was embarrassed and concerned by it. 

Cessationists also loved to say, the tongues they heard about are “gibberish” and we need to “put away childish things.” That's condescension playing as intellect.  They should be concerned about what they are saying: did God give the gift, only to hear it called a “childish thing?” But getting down to theology, their real Scriptural “proof” in how the gifts in “cessation” are based on insisting the word “perfect” in the above verse refers to the arrival of the New Testament canon. Once that happened, they say, all these sign gifts were “done away,” and what happens in “sign gifts” now is not from the Holy Spirit, since there is no new “hearing from the Lord.” They say the Lord is heard from in Scripture, and no more—not through tongues or prophecy, they say.

But these verses above are not saying what they assume. Let’s hear from John Piper, conservative theologian and author, speaking about the word “perfect” in verse 12:

“It says ‘Now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face.’ Is it more likely that Paul is saying, ‘Now before the New Testament is written, we see in a mirror dimly; but then when the New Testament is written, we shall see face to face’? Or is it more likely he is saying, ‘Now in this age we see Him in a mirror dimly; but then when the Lord returns, we shall see Him face-to-face’?”

The latter version, as Piper implies, is much more likely correct--especially since there are several references in the Old Testament, and at least two in the New (Revelation 22:4, I John 3:2), that our desire is to see Jesus face to face, and know Him better. So Jesus is more likely what the Bible means when it says “that which is perfect." Thus, cessationists have probably lost their main "proof" verse as support.  So it’s likely that all the gifts are still active, still Spirit-inspired, until Jesus has His second advent. Then we (or they) will no longer need the gifts.

Besides, if God wanted us to know that the nine gifts are to be split up, some we keep, but others we don’t keep, wouldn’t He have said so in the I Corinthians listing of them?

The non-believers give this further argument: The arrival of New Testament canon, and its modern publishing, meant “hearing from the Lord” through miraculous signs is not necessary any more--so we “don’t need” the sign gifts; we should just read Scripture to get general guidance, and rely on feelings and our rational mind (and the Holy Spirit guides us, too). They’re assuming that charismatics, looking for prophecies and tongue interpretations, are easily deluded into swallowing an anti-Christian idea that might creep up. Well, it's true that there are tongue-speakers or charlatans trying to delude. That kind of deception Satan lives off of. But think of this:  is it possible that those who rely on feelings or rational thought that they think to Holy Spirit is guiding them to, the results are better rather than listening to someone with a gift of discernment?  Is it possible that relying on our own interpretation of events could ever be deluded by someone, or something, besides God?  Satan's emissaries are around to put a thought in your head too.  One answer for all that--that many cessationists default to--is to assume that if God seems silent after prayer on an issue--they are to then rely on their own logic, figuring their Scriptural knowledge will keep them from deviating from God's overall will.  But I have found that if God is silent, say on a question of “should we buy that house?” it could be that He is disapproving. If our feelings are leading us, even if we call them “rational,”  we are in trouble. Many Christians are not mature enough to figure on how to get the Holy Spirit’s guidance.

But I've seen many cessationists eventually doing something that they wanted to do in the first place anyway.  They say that "my positive feeling are ‘from the Lord.’"  Or, some will cite some set of circumstances as God's answer.  True, I've heard of this line of thought working for the good with missionaries.  But for most people, they just stumble across a set of events and capitalize on it, though I can't agree about their connection like they do. It's easy to twist all this to get what you wanted—because you wanted it too much. Cessationists can be deluded too.

Some who rely totally on their logic also reject Spirit-led circumstances because their brain does not allow for supernatural in these times, so they never really try all this—but they say, "God's Scripture is all we got.  We decide the rest based on the moral guardrails that are there."  Sounds great, but how many people really know that Scripture has often more than one way of looking at a subject?  I've proven in other blogs how people like to "cherry pick" Scripture that agrees with them.  Face it, we are really obtuse about looking objectively about ourselves, our feelings.  Our logic can be warped by sin.  We fail to "look outside the box" for a solution, or we hate to let a decision wait for "God's timing."  We want it Now!

Well, for believers in all gifts, how do you rely on the sign gifts when there could be deception?  One answer is, rely on the most spiritual men who believe this way and are seriously overseeing, and ask them to apply discernment and advise you.  This is better than doing a sweeping dismissal of the entire gift. Throwing out all of it—baby and bath water—is the lazy choice, and not the best one.

Now let’s talk about Scripture for gifts. I believe we still need them. Look at Mark 16:17:

And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues;

Those who believe in sign gifts argue that the power herein is God's gift for His children.  This power is also for the purpose of globalizing the gospel to “the end of the earth" (Acts 1:8). Well, that goal hasn’t quite happened yet, so we still need the gift. To argue that the purpose of sign gifts expired in the first century's apostles (or in the fourth century, when the canon was completed) is less likely.

Plus, the argument that it was "limited to the apostles" doesn’t hold water. Stephen had it, Acts 6:8—but he was not an apostle:

And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and signs among the people..

And then there are Paul’s detailed instructions on these gifts. In I Corinthians, three chapters are devoted off-and-on to this difficult subject of gifts—three chapters means it’s important.  But pastors still stay away from this rather than figuring it all out. In all those chapters, he says nothing about these gifts ceasing.

Read his words in I Corinthians 1:7:

…so that you come short in no gift, eagerly waiting for the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ

That clearly indicates that he wants to see everyone possessing the gifts, all the way up to the last days, “the revelation of our Lord.” So he was teaching the opposite of cessation. Consider, too, what he "bragged" in I Corinthians 14:18:

I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all

Well, that speaks a good word for tongues, does it not? Now in all honesty, Paul has restrictions on tongues—and he figures another gift, prophecy, is more important. (Of course, love is the most important of all—if we understand what the word “love” means). He wants an interpretation to each tongue, because otherwise no one could understand it (I Cor. 14:2). By the way, this by itself dismisses a frequent cessationist argument that tongues, if they operate, should all be like Acts 2, in a known language. But here, Paul is flat-out saying, if you don’t have an interpreter, no one will understand your tongue. And he's not talking about mission work in I Corinthians 14.  So he’s definitely saying that it covers unknown tongues as well. But with an interpretation, it becomes useful. That idea is further confirmed in I Corinthians 14:15:

What is the conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will also pray with the understanding. I will sing with the spirit, and I will also sing with the understanding.

To give this contrasting statement “I will pray with the spirit, and I will also pray with the understanding,” suggests they sang or prayed in an unknown tongue. Perhaps privately, perhaps in church with an interpreter. Having a gift of tongues, even operated quietly by oneself, is still a spiritual uplift.  So there seems room in Scripture for a private unknown tongue as well as in public, or a church meeting.

Pastors nowadays hang on to cessationism, I fear, because all this “chaos,” as they figure it, in public would turn most of the congregation off (especially the older ones, who are the biggest givers in offerings).  But in those days, the church still grew even with these strange gifts. Are people that much different today? I say, no; for that matter, the pastor should not fear a reduced congregation when this happens; he will be left with people who love Scripture more than man’s tradition.  And he should educate his congregation so they will be open to something new like tongues.   The church should still grow because of its love and openness to something new.

Lastly, many pastors fear the loss of control. The service “has” to end after one hour and fifteen minutes—to allow for the next service. (Too many pastors have to preach two or three times in succession, especially in Florida in fall or winter).

A couple serious words of warning: Do not try to force yourself to speak in tongues through an altered state of consciousness, brought on by chanting, breathing irregularly, “emptying your mind,” drugs, or any other way. There is no Scripture backing you up, and you may indeed be inviting demons to come in for residence.

I must confess, though I am in favor of all gifts, from Scripture, I have never spoken in tongues.

Paul also said that tongues in a church service were for the unbelievers; i.e., to have them see that God is at work in this service. I Corinthians 14:22:

...tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers

But don’t get the idea that tongues have to be limited to a crusade tent in Africa where the "unbelievers" are. We showed their further usefulness above; it could still be in the U.S. And here’s a short testimony by a noted church father, Irenaeus, in 202 AD. “..we do also hear many brethren in the Church, who possess prophetic gifts, and who through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages, and bring to light for the general benefit the hidden things of men, and declare the mysteries of God…they being spiritual because they partake of the Spirit.” This says, first of all, that tongues and prophecies didn’t die with the apostles—since Irenaeus was 100 years later. (Augustine, a great (but controversial) theologian around 400 AD, had kept a record of a long list of miracles in his day as well, from special gifts). Secondly, this implies that tongues, when interpreted, are also useful in church in revealing a sin that became a convicting rebuke to some unbelievers. (Rebuking people in their sin: there’s a concept.)

Finally, Paul writes, not just for the church at Corinth, but for everybody, I Corinthians 14:39:

Therefore, brethren, desire earnestly to prophesy, and do not forbid to speak with tongues.

The second half of the verse is exactly what many “Bible-believing” pastors are doing, forbidding it, breaking this command from God.

Speaking of miracles: Miracles go on today, but hardly ever in the U.S. There are constant mission reports of many miracles in South America, India, in Muslim countries, in Asia, and Africa. Many involve healing. Where demonic activity is visible, God steps up the supernatural and makes His power more visible. But not much of this happens in the U.S. My suspicion? Satan can see that the U.S. churches are weak because they can’t overcome people’s materialism. We are lukewarm. (Are we the modern church of Laodicea in Revelation 3:14-18?) So why should he “rock the boat” that is swinging us to sleep? The author, Cris Putnam, quotes a Barna poll that indicates that 59% of the U.S. “Christians” do NOT believe there is a real Satan! Satan is fine with this; he hopes we all lull ourselves into hell. Shades of C.S. Lewis’s Screwtape Letters! We must remember that Jesus would not work miracles when faced with stubborn unbelief (Matthew 13:58). We cannot let this lack of miracles be a self-fulfilling prophecy—in other words, if the lack of miracles increases our cynicism—this would lead to even fewer miracles yet.

It’s possible people are using gifts without knowing in advance about them. There is a story about the great preacher Charles Spurgeon—a Calvinist and cessationist, by the way, who stumbled into miracles of his own. In his autobiography he tells how he interrupted a sermon to point at a young man in the audience, telling him that the gloves he was wearing were stolen from his employer! (A bold move, considering the time period). Later in his office, the dumbfounded and convicted young man confessed his sin. Spurgeon further wrote, “I could tell as many as a dozen similar cases in which I pointed at somebody in the hall without having the slightest knowledge of the person .…except I believed I was moved by the Spirit to say it.” Whether he knew it or not, that’s the gift of knowledge in operation. We’re often ignorant of our gift, or don’t want to use it, or afraid to use it. Mr. Spurgeon’s faith door must have been opened a little more after that supernatural event.

And this gets to the reason for the author Mr. Putnam mentioning this subject. His book is about the supernatural. But cessationism is a refusal to believe in certain kinds of supernatural. Putnam calls this cessationist doctrine a “sanctified form of unbelief,” and believes we are dangerously discounting the supernatural in American churches. Even our sermons are not exposing or attacking Satan, or educating people on demons, for instance. They are also dismissing the power of the Holy Spirit by marginalizing three of His nine divine gifts--that is not a good thing. Mr. Putnam calls it “demythologizing the Holy Spirit.” Since the Holy Spirit is God, denying His power may lead to His judgment on the cessationist.

According to Joel 2:28-31:

“And it shall come to pass afterward That I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh; Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, Your old men shall dream dreams, Your young men shall see visions. 29 And also on My menservants and on My maidservants will pour out My Spirit in those days…And the moon into blood, Before the coming of the great and awesome day of the LORD.

What if many pastors of churches, dismissing the supernatural, then dismisses these prophecies, visions, and dreams that may happen in their church to warn of the end-time days are coming?  When God wants to warn them that new, terrible things will be happening and they need to get ready?  Isn’t it possible that God wants to warn us of the upcoming End Times tribulation, and provides these signs. If we react stone-faced to information God wants us to know, if He presented it to us in this "distasteful" way, and we ignore it, we won’t be ready for the antichrist—and could then be easily manipulated and even fall into apostasy. That "falling away" danger will be greatest among those who believe in a pre-tribulation rapture—what happens when they see that that belief was wrong? (I have other blogs on that subject). Unfortunately, many of the “pre-trib” churches are also cessationists. A double-punch is coming to their faith. When they don't get a rapture, per their pastor's “timing” of end-time chronology, then if they also don’t believe the warnings, they will be blindsided by Satan. The resulting demoralization and confusion--is God's Word reliable? they might ask--will mean they are not ready in the face of persecution. So it's possible to conclude that many people could fall into apostasy simply because they walled off God’s use of supernatural gifts (Matthew 24:24).

Finally, let’s read about the church in Acts 2:40-47:

And with many other words he testified and exhorted them, saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation.” 41 Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them. 42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers. 43 Then fear came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were done through the apostles. 44 Now all who believed were together, and had all things in common, 45 and sold their possessions and goods, and divided them among all, as anyone had need. 46 So continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they ate their food with gladness and simplicity of heart, 47 praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily those who were being saved.

Or, how about I Corinthians 14:26:

How is it then, brethren? Whenever you come together, each of you has a psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for edification

This was a church that had great power, so we should desire to copy it as much as possible, right? But I’ve never heard anybody express any desire to follow that simple “copy the best” idea. Our churches are lacking in many of the areas you read in those two verses above, are we not? The fact is, young people are abandoning their parent’s churches—perhaps because the services seem to be just “going through the motions.” Not much evidence that God is there. Young people see this as hypocrisy.

I want it alive like it was in the early church. Maybe we won’t get this feeling of participation and togetherness that they had until we get persecuted like they were. But cessationism won’t get us into those blessings, that’s for sure.

Acknowledgements: Cris Putnam, The Supernatural Worldview