There are three cultural and religious conditions in America that mix together into a toxic formula that will severely reduce our power in the Lord, unless we take deliberate action. Let’s name them and tell what toxic results the admixture leads us to. Here are the components:
- HIGH RELATIVE INCOME. America has the second highest average family wage in the world. In 2022, it is estimated at $77,500. Luxembourg, a small country with rich people in finance, government, and lower tax among Europe, is first.
- BELIEF IN ETERNAL SECURITY—“once saved, always saved.” A rapidly-growing phenomenon
- BELIEF THAT CHRISTIANS WILL BE RAPTURED BEFORE THE 7 YEAR TRIBULATION. This is called the pre-trib rapture theory. Its opposite is the post-trib theory, belief that Christians must endure the tribulation before being raptured. Pre-trib belief is a growing phenomenon as well.
So, what is the result, in most cases, from mixing these three elements together? You won’t like what I think is the answer: COMPLACENCY--“a feeling of being satisfied with how things are and not wanting to try to make them better…especially when accompanied by unawareness of actual dangers or deficiencies”
You have to admit, if you're living well, if you're sure of heaven, and if you think the Last Days talk going around won't hurt you because you're "outta here" before then, you will be leaning to complacency, "being satisfied with how things are." Well, Scripture actually teaches that that is bad, because of the second phrase of the definition: "not wanting to try to make them better." But God wants us better; to be more like Him. And to bear fruit. So He needs to prune us to make us bear fruit. Look at John 15:1-2:
“I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. 2 Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit He prunes, that it may bear more fruit.
If you want to continue abiding in the Lord, these verses say you must be pruned. Your only alternative choice is, not to accept pruning, which means you ultimately will not bear fruit. The plant (speaking of people, too), without regular pruning, will become wild and unruly, ultimately ugly. Any gardener will tell you, doing the pruning appears to hurt the plant. I had a bush that was outstanding. I would seriously shape it, which meant I would have to shave much its current batch of flowers off. It didn't look great trimmed down so much. I sure hated doing that. But invariably, the plant produced even more flowers. Pruning paid off. But look at John 15:5b-6, if you don't allow God to prune you so as to produce fruit:
He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.
It's obvious that the fire and burning is a reference to hell. All this is to say: God is not happy leaving you in the same spiritual condition as when you were first saved. Let that sink in. Pruning makes you different: you can become more like our Lord, and loving Him more. You can withstand the difficulties in life because you learn faith and patience. On the other hand, if you go to the same church and hang around with the same friends; if your spiritual life consists of reading some Daily Bread, tithing when you have some extra money at the end of a month; and you are not a participant in anybody's spiritual life because your conversation to your kids' troubles comes from your rational wisdom; if you pray generally for the nation to eliminate evil, and keep you and your kids safe, and if your conversation avoids religion as confrontative or bringing on anxiety, then you, sir or ma'am, are likely not growing, and not bearing fruit. That, if you actually believe the Scripture above, is a bad way to be. Like most nominal Christians, you probably believe in, or fall in, the three conditions I outlined above, and you think of yourself as a stable person, not guilty of silliness, and not capable of evil--so your are set for heaven. The problem is not how you would be called the "frozen chosen." The problem is, to grow, you have to reach out and explore and do something on faith. Sometimes you fall on your face. Just brush yourself off, pray with fasting, asking God why your effort did not automatically become gloriously successful; He should give an answer. Seek your spiritually mature friends for advice, too.
So we are talking about #2 and #3, on theology (knowing God). That word scares people; they think they're not smart enough, and the pastor is smarter. Well, just think about all the issues about which denominationalism divides us. How could every pastor have it right, if the theology of Free Will Baptists are the opposite from Presbyterians on some fairly major points? One pastor has to be right, the other has to be wrong. You may argue that "it doesn't make a difference if both congregations have the same percentage of people going to heaven." That may seem so NOW, but the Bible predicts a day is coming when the Antichrist will rule the earth in blasphemy. The pastor that was right, got his people prepared for that eventuality (by NOT preaching on pre-tribulation rapture). So he keeps most of his congregation. But the other pastor, who did preach pre-tribulation rapture, I can guarantee, will lose a lot more people. They are not "outta here" as they expected. They were not trained for the possibility of suffering, even giving their life for the Lord. They may think, hey, I only believed in Him while things were good. Well, we call those bail-outs Apostasy. And people that leave the faith because their pastor wasn't truthful in his Bible studies will see a lot more of his people apostatizing, and they more likely will end up in hell. THAT's important, isn't it? We don't need to feel our shepherd pastor has led us down a primrose path.
Maybe the first thing you could do is, after prayer, after studying to learn how to approach serious Bible study, and having a Bible with connecting verses in the margin, or having a Strongs (these are available online), you start with the assumption that you don't HAVE to believe that your denomination, your favorite church, has all the right doctrines. I have a few blogs on eternal security and pre-tribulation rapture, with lots of Scripture, on this website. But here's a dare: Go to You Tube, listen to a relevant sermon at a .75 playback speed, listen carefully, note the Bible verses, on OTHER belief systems besides eternal security and pre-tribulation rapture. In You Tube's Search mode, write "Arminius" or "Problems with pre-trib rapture." Start there. Try writing notes as the sermon plays without preassumed biases. And in deep prayer, ask God to show you which verses actually prove which doctrine. You may find some truths that your pastor doesn't. I'm not into passing ill will for pastors, but I do note in their explaining, they might have a lack of Scripture that actually proves their point. They were taught it in Theology class at college. They might have just memorized it. Do not seek your pastor until you've done some thinking on your own; you could be more unbiased than him. Another one: search You Tube for "sermon on eternal security" (only because the phrase is not in Scripture), and You Tube will have sermons on both sides of that doctrine. Once you listen in to a sermon on the subject, You Tube will also give you lots more sermons on the same subject the next time you login. It won't hurt you to listen around, making notes, checking Scripture. (The cost for all this is zero; just hit youtube.com.)You can't go by what "feels" right. We tend to deceive ourselves there. God doesn't think like us. He may want you to suffer for Him--I'm sure that thought wasn't the first thing you thought of in doing something for Him. Think of Philippians 1:29:
God gave you the honor not only of believing in Christ but also of suffering for him, both of which bring glory to Christ.
It's possible you will conclue that #2 and #3 above are likely incorrect (because God doesn't want us to be leaning towards complacency--see my study on the Laodicean church below). Maybe, without the support you've imagined from #2 and #3, then you will feel less complacent than before. You may even be feeling a little fear; you may be asking yourself, "have I done any real fruit for Jesus?" So you quickly push away the thought and say, "God would not want me to express fear. This theology is wrong. Maybe that's legalistic, and I'm not under law." But I have another verse for you: Proverbs 9:10:
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom
Well, maybe you have a verse for me: I John 4:18
There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear
I wish more pastors, in their sermons, would explain these surface contradictions. Let me try. Say we grow in the Lord so that our time with Him is deep; we tell Him our troubles, we confess our missed opportunites, our sin. We sincerely repent, and we will study to find the "key" that tripped us into sin, and vow that we will take radical steps to not trip it in the future. Say we failed at stopping an addictive sin; we confess, we realize God still wants us close to Him; and we just start over. We look to Jesus as a friend, not as a harsh Master (He is not our servant, though, answering our prayers just how we like, either). We should fear, though, two things: 1) His hatred of sin. Think of Adam and Eve--one sin! brought disaster); and 2)getting away from an honest relationship with Him, by participating in unconfessed sin or floating along, not motivated to get closer to Him. IF we realize that it takes work to be close to the Lord (not just once-a-day prayer), but thinking often about acting on our gift for Him. What does the Lord want us to say to an unsaved friend, or to your spouse or child? I mean, let's say evidence shows he/she might be going to hell (you need to read Scripture to learn more; don't assume heaven since "they're a good person"). Think of it; is there something more awful than hell? Are you not in awe of the terror of such an eternity? So, is there anything you can say to this person, or do, to kick them off the wrong path? For you to speak the truth, when the culture speaks lies, that's good. That's love. Even if they get angry, at least maybe your words made them think. (You water the seed; another draws the harvest). Perhaps you have a global version of your help; you hate to see people trapped with a culture and religion of lies; what money can you give, that will send an evangelist their way, from a gospel organization, and speak repentance and faith to them from the Lord? If you do that, you have love too. Caution: If we try something new like that, we might assume that God will be so proud of us that He will "fix all that troubles us"--but surprise, we didn't touch that person like we thought, or God makes things harder for us than they were before! That's when we get stoic. God has reasons for making things hard, but He doesn't have to tell me. And it doesn't mean I'm out of His will, or getting chastised for my past. No, your past is gone to Him. But your past might make it easier to sin. That sin requires confession and work to make you holy.
So, you began to think on others, not yourself, people near or far that are persecuted or can't get meals. You learned to be fearful of eternity if you did nothing. But you loved people, and that kind of love took away your fear. That resolves the "contradiction" in the two verses above. By acting in new ways, you feel yourself in His will, bearing fruit, being pruned. You learn to ride over difficulties without striking out at people, without feeling depressed and addictive. You learned patience. Let no "pastor" tell you that now since you have eternal security, no introspection is needed, no further confession is needed. That's a lie. Consider II Corinthians 13:5:
Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not know yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you are disqualified.
That examination is not a one-time deal; it should be often. Obviously, in being close to the Lord, we should do our darndest to ask the Holy Spirit so we can have an objective self-examination. We might have a journal where we list miraculous things God has done in answer to our prayers--but we also have a list of our sins. So we don't forget. We might examine ourselves at the time of Communion (as it says in I Corinthians 11:27ff), but we need to do it more often. It should include confession. He loves us. He is not in the business of knocking us down (maybe our dad or mom did that), but Jesus wants to help us kill the sin. People are ignoring their sin nowadays, and they have no fear of God or of punishment in eternity. Remember, there is only one unpardonable sin (ascribing to Satan the work of the Holy Spirit). He can forgive all others, but we must truly repent.
Let's get back to complacency. It is bad, because you're comfortable in "your box," but not exercising your gifts. But, stuck there, you don't exercise faith to reach out and take a chance on doing something extraordinary (extraordinary for you). You don't even look for sins that you repeat day after day. No fair saying, "That's the way I am--deal with it."
So I hope you dealt with #2 and #3, and the sins of complacency. Now let's talk about #1.
#1 is the income. How can large income add to a toxic mix of complacency? Did you know that high income, without God's advice in servicing it, is a possible curse? Why? First, you must know that Jesus had a lot of harsh words about rich people. That's one point against it for starters. Unfortunately, you probably also know that pastors will bend over backwards on those verses to say "it's all right if you're rich." Well, you'd think a pastor would explain that contradiction that they have introduced. I will try. Start with the assumption that you got rich legally; you didn't push anybody out of their home, etc. How should you feel about this windfall of riches? That God made me rich because I'm smart, or I'm definitely going to heaven because He smiles on me? Well, Neither of those. The first thing to think about (remember, it's a curse otherwise), is this: You are to take that wealth as a sign that God has seen you fit to take on an increase in your responsibility. How's that? Well, the money is not yours. It's God's; He's letting you be the caretaker. You are not to spend it as you would like to; you are to take His directions as to how to use it. Because riches are like the gold ring Frodo was wearing in Lord of the Rings "The Return." His reactions should be your reactions. He will not keep it. Very important. (And you won't, upon death). He was bent on actually getting rid of it, Because it was doing no good just hanging on to it. It is a huge temptation while he had it. Temptation to do evil will hypnotically entrance you--you will do things that you would never do, if you had no money to pay for it. Your connection with worldly things is far higher if you are rich. If you are wealthy, who knows the deceptive people who want to get you in on the latest easy-money deal? Frodo had to deal with a connection with the deceptive and killer Gollum who would otherwise had ignored him. You would likely start to think a lot more about owning more new worldly possessions. You must train yourself to be determined to get rid of it. How DO you get rid of it? By building up a treasure in heaven, not earth. By giving it away to charity. Continue to live a moderate life as before. Begin to spend more than 10% to the Lord, if you are indeed wealthy (and have your debts paid off first.) You've heard that giving to the Lord is a loan, one that He will pay back, many times over? But, be careful--the idea is speaking of a payback in heaven, not necessarily while you're on earth.
If perchance, God should give you excess income, you can either spend it, or you can save a lot of it, by living modestly. Saving it can be a curse too. Jesus emphasized not worrying about material possessions (Matthew 6:25-34), so you don't need a half million dollaars of savings to feel comfortable in the Lord. If you save a lot, you might be tempted to act on a gambling addiction. You start that by refusing the 5% from CDs or Treasuries. You feel you "have to" invest it in volatile stocks, especially bitcoin or what some analyst recommends (whom you never knew before). This is not building treasures in heaven--unless you will a chunk of your estate to a charitable organization--I hope you know someone on the Board of Directors, who isn't a gambling addict themselves.
More likely, your determination to put it all in savings might be "to keep me safe in case something goes bad." But who is your estate Defender? God. You should only have a minimum of savings; give the rest away to charity. Maybe you save it for the kids or family members. Do you see problems in that? I do. If riches are a temptation of the world, if your kids are not trained in Scriptural integrity; then you have spread to them a giant temptation, a big curse. I have a blog on solving the problem, titled something like Radical: Give the Excess Away. There's Biblical proof in it.
But a bigger problem, for the moderate incomes, is what families are willing to do to pay off debt, or acquire some savings. Too Many Couples assume the only way to succeed is if both spouses are working. Do you see problems yet? Well, studies show that in every low-income country, people have lots of kids. In high income families, they have way fewer kids. So, by both working, that usually means people are likely missing out on the greatest thing ever--children. Don't let TV or the culture convince you otherwise. Kids also keep married couples married, so their vows to God can be true. Couples that have seperate incomes develop separate interests, and their spouse doesn't give them enough time (they're both tired from work), so they become boring to each other. That increases the chance of unfaithfulness or stimulation from alcohol, etc.
But what happens if only one spouse is working? Would it offend you if I suggsted the husband should carry that ball? The wife is a (gasp) homemaker; she gets to be with the kids and enjoy watching them grow up, and teaching them Scripture applications. But how does the couple survive on one income? Only one way: cut the expenses to third world level. Oh, no--you may not even know--what does the phrase "cut expenses" even mean?? Counter-cultural I go. (Hey, most of Jesus' advice WAS counter-cultural). Everybody else loves materialism; they expand expenses if the income is higher . Adopting a third world living environment so you can give to the Lord might mean one TV, one phone in the house, no "toys"--i.e., no boats, jet skis, etc.) And no buying that vacation home, or renovating your home "just because I want to express myself" or "yeah, the present stuff works fine, but I'm bored with it. Let's renovate or move!" Moving is expensive. You'll move up, of course, meaning you have less equity in the house (to pass on to the kids, or maybe to the Lord), so your utility bills, your real estate taxes, your house insurance, are higher. And there's moving expenses, plus "new friends" (but is it even possible to have the deep friendship level away like you had where you grew up?).
Maybe, instead, you may actually, for the Lord, pass up on a promotion that would uproot you. Not having roots is bad, plain and simple. With tried-and-true friends, you're a more ffective evangelist for the Lord. Your words have more "gravitas." Their advice to you is more likely "right on" because they really know you.
About spreading your income. It can make the difference between heaven and hell for somebody. Let me explain. Let's say the gift the Holy Spirit gave you is giving to the Lord's work. Remember this: God may not want you to give it all to your kids. I don't know how many nasty fights I've seen in "who gets what," even about some ridiculous item. When it comes to coveting what mom and dad may leave when they die, there have been some horror stories. May God keep us from coveting, or causing other people to covet, and putting up a wall with a brother or sister. God will honor us if we act with integrity. Having a spiritually immature person in a situation of inheritance will bring on anger, coveting, cheating. Just avoid all that, and give it all to the Lord. If you are dividing your estate among your kids, but one child needs it a little more, it may be because they served the Lord in giving poorly, and the Lord is returning the "favor." Ask the Lord about if you should feel obligated to give different amounts to different kids.
I have a suggestion for your giving to charity: You need to think globally. In the U.S., you may have people that only get one meal a day. True. But there are a lot of places in the world that they have zero meals a day. They are being persecuted by Muslims, or Hindus, who want to kill them. Try to get past the hatred for immigrants of the world. Many of these people are simply running because their home areas are run by drug runners, so gunplay is everywhere, or their nation is run by corruption, so justice is not there. Pray, and consider going for the organization or country that is the purest aspect of "love your neighbor."
So let's summarize the three toxic elements that a lot of people in America have:
High Relative Income. If well-off people have any “religion” at all, the most-frequent assumption they make (if they call themselves "Christian"): “God gave me high income because He loves me. As Deuteronomy 28 shows, He blesses those who follow Him. So since I am blessed, He must love me, so I’m heaven bound.” Well, that’s Old Covenant, or Old Testament. Some of those rules got wiped out in the New Covenant. Jesus introduced the rules for rich people in the New Covenant. Let’s look at the new rule: Matthew 19:23-24:
Then Jesus said to His disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
Let’s make sure we understand this: Jesus was saying, it’s more difficult for a rich person to be saved-- than a middle or lower income person. So if few, overall, find the narrow way to salvation (Matthew 7:13-14), then America, with a larger number of richer people, would actually be lower in saved people than whatever the "few" figure is. So, America is a nation with 'way more unsaved people, and has a larger portion of unsaved instead of saved people. Did you have that impression before? (Over 60% claim they are "Christian.") I did, because of how easy the traffic is to get to church, how many churches are starved for help, how many churches preach "easy believism." People are easily able, in a group of 300 or more, to achieve anonymity. Congregants put on a face. Many people have grievous sin, but nobody knows. Couples come in for the 9 am service, and they're not married. Maybe they are practicing sexual immorality. Nobody knows.
Rich people have a big problem; they get involved with the world, and love its comforts. But Jesus says they can't love the world and also love God (Matthew 6:24). Matthew 6:19-20 further says:
“Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; 20 but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal.
Consider Matthew 13:22, where the Sower of the world has many failures and only one success; here is one of his failures:
22 Now he who received seed among the thorns is he who hears the word, and the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and he becomes unfruitful.
What kind of “deceitfulness” did the Lord mean? Maybe assuming riches will make you happy? But rich people have more divorces, and more difficulties with the grown-up kids. Or maybe "since I'm rich, I can handle any difficulties that come along with my wallet." Another way of saying, "I don't need God." We should say, about all our wealthy incomes, “God, through no particular reason on my part, allowed me to be rich—what does God want me to do with this special gift He has given me for Him?”
Let’s move on to the second cause of the cultural disaster of: Belief in eternal security. Supposedly, to feel good about salvation, all you have to do is say, “I was saved at a youth camp in the summer of 2022. And I've lived a pretty clean life since. So I’m saved forever. No need to worry about hell. So I’m Rock Solid about Eternal Security." (Definition: I’m as complacent as I can be). "Pastor told me so." Well, God bless that pastor. He will have to give an account for his deception. Scripture is full of verses that clearly indicate that security is conditional on your fruit, from holiness. I have a three-part blog on this one: Escaping Hell (Part 1), and Do Peter, James and John…(Part 2) and Do Paul…(Part 3). Or, try several hours of reading all of the four Gospels, focusing on Jesus' words about salvation. Believe that Jesus means what He says. Read it over and over, until you are convicted, and change a few things--or change your beliefs. And listen to theology sermons on You Tube
Now we move to the third of the triad causing our country’s massive complacency: The pre-trib rapture doctrine. (By the way, I used to be in all three of these camps before. But I’ve always been a reader, and He led me to some good reading material.) I only have space to give you one difficulty with the pre-tribbers: Their theology has Christians being raptured, without any pre-indicators, before the end-times tribulation. The horrible things of those last tribulation days—wars, famines, earthquakes, massive persecution and martyrdom—will happen on earth while you’re "enjoying" heaven. The Holy Spirit, a Comfort and a witness of His grace to non-believers, will not happen to your friends and unsaved relatives, because you will be gone, and unable to help them when they need you the most. Thus, a “Christian” who believes this theology, will be effectively saying, to his unsaved relatives and friends: “You should be saved as I am. We can leave this scene and leave non-believers to suffer the greatest misfortune of their lives without us. When they need us the most, Jesus takes us out of here.” You know what the thinking non-believer will think when hearing this raw explanation of the pre-tribber mindset? “Oh, sure; you want me to believe in a theology of abandoning people I care for, a theology of complete selfishness. Is that what Christianity is? You can keep it, my un-friend.”
Another fact is, the pre-trib rapture theory is not a historical Christian belief; the idea was created around 1830. It’s the opposite of the “post-trib” theology that was believed by almost all "futurist" Christians for 1800 years before that. The predominant historical belief was, Christians will have to hang around through the end times and suffer, and possibly giving their life for Him. So this newer pre-trib idea says, in effect: For the first 1800 years, when the greatest minds that Christians had, from men close to Him, people who changed Rome, they all believed wrong, because they believed Jesus had two Advents--Jesus at birth and Jesus at resurrection and judgment. The “truth” is, the pre-tribbers say, Jesus is having 3 Advents—at birth, at His return in judgment, and a previously unknown middle one, a secret rapture of Christians living then. Of course, there isn’t a single solid Scripture to prove it, but if you twist some Scripture like a pretzel, and compartmentalize others, you’ve got this "great theology that people love to hear about, without real study, so it must be true! All those 1800 years, those guys were all wrong. We have it right now—the subtitle for our theology is: Good Luck, the rest of you: when things start to heat up, We’re Outta Here!"
If that isn’t a complacent theology, I don’t know what is.
So there you have it. Three corrupting effects among most "evangelical Christians”
My claim that many of those who say they are saved, and follow these three doctrines, aren’t saved at all. They are unaware because they are complacent. Remember, too, the last part of the definition of complacency--“unawareness of actual dangers.” As I have given and read many testimonies of these things, pastors and church leaders do not have enough respect to even check other theories out. They evidently feel so good in their current belief system, that rocking that boat is a threat to their good feelings. They do not know God, in many cases. "Let's keep it as is, God seems to be pretty good to me right now."
My final word: Look at what Jesus said to the church at Laodicea (Rev. 3:15-19):
“I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot. I could wish you were cold or hot. 16 So then, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will vomit you out of My mouth. 17 Because you say, ‘I am rich, have become wealthy, and have need of nothing’—and do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked— 18 I counsel you to buy from Me gold refined in the fire, that you may be rich; and white garments, that you may be clothed, that the shame of your nakedness may not be revealed; and anoint your eyes with eye salve, that you may see. 19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten.[l] Therefore be [m]zealous and repent.
Why would God wish they would be either cold or hot? Because if they were cold, they would be a good ground for evangelism IF you actually speak on sin, and the terrible destination of the un-repentant, they would clearly know that they have sinned, They know that they avoided God, and they realize the need for repentance. Getting saved is possible for them. Obviously, not a problem if they were "hot" for the Lord, that's self-explanatory. But what makes the "lukewarm" people make Jesus want to vomit them out of His mouth? (That separation from Him means the lukewarm are unsaved). Well, they said they were rich, they said they "have need of nothing." Doesn't this sound like complacency that I've been talking about? It sure does. But Laodicea was one of two churches that got zero words of commendation, out of 7 churches. So this church hasn't done anything much for the Lord, it looks like. God wants them to refocus on what "rich" really is; to get "rich," it costs something (as you can see by the phrase "refined in the fire"). They are stuck in the world (they need white garments to be clean; they should feel shame), they need to be zelous to repent of evidently many sins. Right now they are blind, naked before Him, in shame, so it doesn't look like they are saved.
So that's the danger of complacency. If you have those two doctrines, and/or you are above average in income, truly examine yourself. A careful reading of the Gospels clearly shows, Jesus has expectations of His followers. Floating along, enjoying His "love," is not where it's at. Don't go by feelings; go by His Word. You could be deceiving yourself to claim that you are saved.
As Forrest Gump once said, "that's all I'm going to say about that.'
No comments:
Post a Comment