Perhaps the most important question of all time, whether we want to think about it, is, What happens after we die? Is there life after death? This question has puzzled mankind since Adam, and there are many different theories suggested. And God is rather clear in the Bible on this subject, as He would be, since Scripture claims in various places that He loves His children—so He would tell us “where we’re moving to.”
So, let’s study what the Word says on the “moving” issue. Let’s promise ourselves that what the Scripture says is more important than what our church says. It looks like the correct doctrine includes an intermediate state, which has either been warped or lost. But it’s definitely in Scripture. Studying that is the ultimate focus of this blog.
The most detailed explanation of life just beyond the grave is found in Jesus’ account of the rich man and Lazarus. See Luke 16:22-31, where Jesus says:
22 So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham’s bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 “Then he cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.’ 25 But Abraham said, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented. 26 And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.’ 27 “Then he said, ‘I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father’s house, 28 for I have five brothers, that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.’ 29 Abraham said to him, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ 30 And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ 31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’”
What do we see?
1) The previously poor man is in “Abraham’s bosom,” v.22. He is “comforted.” The rich man is “afar off”—a “great gulf fixed”-- in hades, Scripture says. Yet they’re both in the same area, since they can talk to one another. Abraham's bosom is the good part of this place, but the "hot" section (see "in this flame") is the bad part. But they're communicating, so they're in the same place. They are spirits, not bodies, but they can feel. We conclude "hades" is the proper name for the whole place, since the word is used several times in Scripture (beware--some Bible versions goof this up). So hades had two parts, separated from one another by a great gulf, presumably alluding to its depth.
2) The rich man in the suffering region then becomes the focus. He is “in torments.” He “cries out” in agony. Thirst is a serious problem, since a flame is nearby.
2) The rich man in the suffering region then becomes the focus. He is “in torments.” He “cries out” in agony. Thirst is a serious problem, since a flame is nearby.
3) He has a memory--he is well aware of his previous life, since he remembered his brothers and now wants to see them saved. This adds to his mental anxiety while there.
4) As vv 27-31 show, there is no way that someone in the lower region can warn those still alive. Thus, seances would be meaningless, today as well as then.
5) Jesus, as the designer of hades, is tough on this man:
a. Through Abraham, He is willing to let him suffer, acknowledging “you are tormented” --without relieving him.
b. When the man complains of his suffering, Jesus through Abraham even taunts him, reminding him of the reversal of roles for the two of them—and telling him, too bad, he can’t change his fate
For those who want to cast the doctrine in these verses aside, calling it uncompassionate, only a parable: I don't think it is a parable, since it has named Lazarus, and parables don’t give names. This is God’s truth for the intermediate state, what happens right after we die. Even if it were a parable, would Jesus set forth a myth about what happens when we die--would He express an untruth on such an important issue? Would He say, "Hah! I got you. This was just pretending, to get you off the track. I have another solution elsewhere, so I am deliberately unclear as your destination just so you could worry about it or consider it unsolvable so you would ignore it." I think not.
Part of the reason I believe this is a truth is the related backup Scriptures, below. Another reason is that it was universally believed by the earliest church fathers; they were brilliant men in their knowledge of Scripture, and believed it was truth. They knew their Greek backward and forward, they knew the culture, they could have asked questions of the apostles, or someone only a generation from them--and that church was the most dynamic and godly church in history; so I believe their theology was accurate, and God blessed them accordingly.
Part of the reason I believe this is a truth is the related backup Scriptures, below. Another reason is that it was universally believed by the earliest church fathers; they were brilliant men in their knowledge of Scripture, and believed it was truth. They knew their Greek backward and forward, they knew the culture, they could have asked questions of the apostles, or someone only a generation from them--and that church was the most dynamic and godly church in history; so I believe their theology was accurate, and God blessed them accordingly.
Now here are other supporting Scriptures for this particular intermediate state:
1. Luke 23:43 records Jesus’ words on the Cross to the dying and just-saved thief alongside:
And Jesus said to him, “Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be with Me in Paradise.”
What's Paradise? Think with me: if the saved poor man’s first stopover after death, from Luke 16, is “Abraham’s bosom,” as we saw above, and if the first stopover for the just-saved thief is in “paradise,” we have to conclude that paradise is another name for Abraham’s bosom--which, as we showed before, has two parts. So paradise is not heaven (which is only for the saved), nor is it hell (which is for the unsaved only). Neither person we're talking about goes directly to their final destination; they stopover in this hades. They both go to hades, the intermediate state.
2. Jesus went to hades too, NOT HELL when He died, as proved by Matthew 12:40;
and parts of Acts 2:22-27, IF your version of the Bible has the correct word, hades, there. These are from the New King James. :
For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth
From Peter: “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs…you have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death; 24 whom God raised up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that He should be held by it. 25 For David says concerning Him: Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope.27 For You will not leave my soul in hades, nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption.
So Jesus did not die and go straight to heaven; nor did He go to hell, called “gehenna” in Greek, the lake of fire, a different Greek word. Jesus told the thief he was going to paradise--yet these verses combined, clearly show, He went to hades; again, this proves paradise is not heaven, but is in the good part of hades. “In the heart of the earth” doesn't sound like heaven, right? Hades is presumably located deep in earth. His soul did not remain in hades long—three days and nights.
Perhaps your Bible uses "hell" when it should be called "hades." Unfortunately, that Bible also uses "hell" for Greek "gehenna" and "tartarus." Those, however, are three separate places, so the English words should be different, rather than combining them all as "hell." Blame William Tyndale. He took three Greek words, meaning different things, and translated them all "hell" in English. A proper modern translation would catch this.
These truths about the intermediate state were so universally believed by the earliest Christians that it became part of the original Apostles’ Creed: I believe in God the Father Almighty…and in Jesus Christ…was crucified, dead and buried. He descended to hades (the Greek word); on the third day rose from the dead…Jesus did not go to hell, but hades.
3. John 14:1-3:
“Let not your heart be troubled; you believe in God, believe also in Me. 2 In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also.
Note the underlined phrase. This proves that when the righteous die, they do not go immediately to heaven to be with Jesus. Why? Well, He has to “come again” (His second coming) and pick us up, and then we go to heaven. If we were already in heaven (i.e., by rapture, so called), He would not have to “come again” to get us. No, we are in the heart of the earth, in hades, waiting for “pick up.” The pick up will be better than ziplining, better than being an Amazon drone.
4. John 5:28-29:
Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice 29 and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.
Thus, both groups will “come forth” (at the second coming) to the Judgment at the same time (your denomination may not believe this "judgement at the same time" idea--even though it seems explicit here--and elsewhere). So hades will be emptied all at once. If we’re already in heaven, as often taught, the resurrection would be no big deal--since we're "already there," in spirit. It would be just picking up the body. But the important thing is being with Jesus in heaven--but this has already been going on, according to them, in spirit. But they are wrong. It will be a total resurrection, body and soul--a big deal, as Scripture points out excitedly. It gets us, soul and body, from hades to heaven, not from heaven to heaven with a body.
5. I Corinthians 15:22-23:
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 23 But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming.
When Jesus comes again, we are "alive," not at time of death. The immediate heaven folks place our spirit immediately in heaven, with Christ--the definition of "made alive," is it not? But Jesus says that we're not "made alive" until the resurrection. In the intermediate theory, we are not really With Christ until the resurrection.
6. I Thessalonians 4:16-17:
For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive (alive on earth) and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.
The first verse indicates the Second Coming (not the 3rd coming, as rapturists believe). Note that "the dead in Christ" will rise. It doesn't specify only their bodies, but simply says "the dead" will rise. Also note that verse 17 says we will "meet the Lord in the air." Many modern commentaries say our spirit goes immediately to heaven when we die; and say that when Jesus comes down, He comes with the spirits of His saved people to pick up their bodies. They "prove" it by giving a verse that says He will bring, the proper Greek word defined, "a host." But he host is referred to in most cases as angels. Also, consider the phrase we will "meet the Lord in the air." "Meet" here, as a careful Greek study suggests, is "first time I've seen you," since its definition in Vine's Expository Dictionary says "the official welcome of a newly arrived dignitary." We, as body and soul get together, greet our Lord for the first time.
8. Finally, I Peter 5:4:
and when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the crown of glory that does not fade away
It does not make sense that when we die, Jesus just greets our spirit, and says "now wait several hundred years, I've got some cool rewards for you." That's what the immediate heaven group is bound to. It makes more sense that "when the Chief Shepherd appears," at His Second Coming, He takes us up to heaven, and a big gigantic celebration occurs, with worship, song, and rewards.
5. I Corinthians 15:22-23:
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 23 But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming.
When Jesus comes again, we are "alive," not at time of death. The immediate heaven folks place our spirit immediately in heaven, with Christ--the definition of "made alive," is it not? But Jesus says that we're not "made alive" until the resurrection. In the intermediate theory, we are not really With Christ until the resurrection.
6. I Thessalonians 4:16-17:
For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive (alive on earth) and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.
The first verse indicates the Second Coming (not the 3rd coming, as rapturists believe). Note that "the dead in Christ" will rise. It doesn't specify only their bodies, but simply says "the dead" will rise. Also note that verse 17 says we will "meet the Lord in the air." Many modern commentaries say our spirit goes immediately to heaven when we die; and say that when Jesus comes down, He comes with the spirits of His saved people to pick up their bodies. They "prove" it by giving a verse that says He will bring, the proper Greek word defined, "a host." But he host is referred to in most cases as angels. Also, consider the phrase we will "meet the Lord in the air." "Meet" here, as a careful Greek study suggests, is "first time I've seen you," since its definition in Vine's Expository Dictionary says "the official welcome of a newly arrived dignitary." We, as body and soul get together, greet our Lord for the first time.
8. Finally, I Peter 5:4:
and when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the crown of glory that does not fade away
It does not make sense that when we die, Jesus just greets our spirit, and says "now wait several hundred years, I've got some cool rewards for you." That's what the immediate heaven group is bound to. It makes more sense that "when the Chief Shepherd appears," at His Second Coming, He takes us up to heaven, and a big gigantic celebration occurs, with worship, song, and rewards.
Hopefully these many Scriptures will be convincing. But, you ask, "I don't think anyone teaches this, so how can it be correct?" Well, many Mennonites, some Brethren, some Amish, some in the Restoration movement, some conservative Anglicans still teach this.
Well--so we've had it wrong for centuries? How could that be?
Actually, teaching on the intermediate state has gotten dropped because the Reformation tried to get as far away from the Catholics’ false teaching on purgatory. Purgatory teaches that (a) the Intermediate State can cleanse your sins and can change final status. False. Scripture shows that hades (the real Intermediate State) does not change final status, as we saw in Luke. The sincere pleadings of the rich man were greeted coldly. The rich man encountered Jesus not as merciful, but as Judge. Remember, few are saved (Matthew 7:14). We are shocked and sometimes uncomfortable about seeing this "negative side" of God. But He doesn't think as we do. We cannot imagine, for instance, how deep is God’s hatred about sin. If you’re unsaved when you go into hades, you’re unsaved when you go out. That's what the Word says. Period. There is no Scriptural basis for “cleansing from sin” in that state either. The idea that you can purge your own sin is completely false and anti-Biblical, as Scriptural points out, and I point out in many blogs. Jesus has done that cleansing from sin for us. The “works vs faith” argument was what kick-started the Reformation—a just movement in its beginning, but it went to wrong theology on some points to get away from looking Catholic.
Well--so we've had it wrong for centuries? How could that be?
Actually, teaching on the intermediate state has gotten dropped because the Reformation tried to get as far away from the Catholics’ false teaching on purgatory. Purgatory teaches that (a) the Intermediate State can cleanse your sins and can change final status. False. Scripture shows that hades (the real Intermediate State) does not change final status, as we saw in Luke. The sincere pleadings of the rich man were greeted coldly. The rich man encountered Jesus not as merciful, but as Judge. Remember, few are saved (Matthew 7:14). We are shocked and sometimes uncomfortable about seeing this "negative side" of God. But He doesn't think as we do. We cannot imagine, for instance, how deep is God’s hatred about sin. If you’re unsaved when you go into hades, you’re unsaved when you go out. That's what the Word says. Period. There is no Scriptural basis for “cleansing from sin” in that state either. The idea that you can purge your own sin is completely false and anti-Biblical, as Scriptural points out, and I point out in many blogs. Jesus has done that cleansing from sin for us. The “works vs faith” argument was what kick-started the Reformation—a just movement in its beginning, but it went to wrong theology on some points to get away from looking Catholic.
Catholicism also teaches that there is a special status for those classified as “saints”—they get to go straight to heaven. Everybody else has to go to purgatory to “work off” their sins. False. Scripture is clear that everyone saved is a saint. There are no “status” Christians. Philippians 1:1 says:
Paul and Timothy, bondservants of Jesus Christ, to all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with the bishops and deacons.
If saints are only the “status” Christians, why is Paul calling every Christian a “saint,” and, oh yes, let’s not forget the bishops and deacons. How do you explain that?
John Calvin, who formulated many Protestant doctrines (not my favorite person, as I have a blog on him), dropped the intermediate state doctrine. Luther, the same. So both Catholics and most Protestants have it wrong. You’ve got to read Scripture for yourselves, folks.
Now let us deal with verses the "straight to heaven" folks love: Start with I Thessalonians 4:14,which I'd like to add context by adding verses 13, 16 and 17:
Now let us deal with verses the "straight to heaven" folks love: Start with I Thessalonians 4:14,which I'd like to add context by adding verses 13, 16 and 17:
But I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you sorrow as others who have no hope.
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who sleep in Jesus. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.
Note that Paul is answering their concerns about what happens to those who "sleep," or who have already died. Some Thessalonians believed those who have died may "miss the boat" at His coming return. So he explains what happens to dead people by saying they haven't missed anything, they get to be with Him by resurrection, same as those alive at the same time, and same as what happened after He died---ie, be resurrected. If there were ever a good time for Paul to tell them the "truth" that their spirits and bodies are separated, one goes up early, the other goes up later--that was the time. But he doesn't cater to that idea. His emphasis is on when we meet the Lord our precious Savior, (what we should all want to know), so he says it is at the same time for dead folks and alive folks. None of this idea that "your spirit will meet Him earlier, THEN your body meets him later."
Note that Paul is answering their concerns about what happens to those who "sleep," or who have already died. Some Thessalonians believed those who have died may "miss the boat" at His coming return. So he explains what happens to dead people by saying they haven't missed anything, they get to be with Him by resurrection, same as those alive at the same time, and same as what happened after He died---ie, be resurrected. If there were ever a good time for Paul to tell them the "truth" that their spirits and bodies are separated, one goes up early, the other goes up later--that was the time. But he doesn't cater to that idea. His emphasis is on when we meet the Lord our precious Savior, (what we should all want to know), so he says it is at the same time for dead folks and alive folks. None of this idea that "your spirit will meet Him earlier, THEN your body meets him later."
Here' something that will open your eyes: Let's look at "bring with Him;" some say those who died and whose spirits went to heaven are "riding with Him." The surprise I have for you is the Greek "bring" is a future derivative of their word pronounced "ago." It means, per the reliable Vine's Expository Dictionary, "to lead along" The visual image you get is Jesus coming to earth, leading ALL of us along in a resurrection, and going "home." Will the saints "riding with Him" be leading? Not hardly--that glorious job is His alone. Do these "ride along" saints call out for the rest of the "split up" alive saved folks to join them? No.
PS. This explanation is simple and uncomplicated, and it helps if you don't believe in a separate Rapture. Note that if you believe in a rapture, He has three comings. And all the commentaries are lying about His coming in judgment being His second coming. You would have to believe it's His third coming. (First was His Incarnation; second, His "rapture;" third, His coming in judgment.) I have a separate series of blogs on this. If you DO believe in a Rapture, the explanation for how who goes to heaven, and when, twists Scripture around like a pretzel to figure out. I won't even try, feeling that God would make it simple to figure out the important question of "where do we go when we die?" Many people have too much riding on their un-Greek definition of "bring with Him." Why couldn't Paul, who is on the subject of dead people, first give an introductory sentence by saying, God will resurrect them too? Both, He will ultimately "bring with Him," at the second coming.
Another favorite Scripture of "straight to heavens": Ephesians 4:8-10:
Another favorite Scripture of "straight to heavens": Ephesians 4:8-10:
Therefore He says: “When He ascended on high He led captivity captive, And gave gifts to men.” 9 (Now this, “He ascended”—what does it mean but that He also first descended into the lower parts of the earth? 10 He who descended is also the One who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things.)
"Captivity captive" is confusing for even the experts to figure out. It could mean either the enemy captured, or the rescue of our own held captive by the enemy. So, flip a coin. If you choose the latter, Jesus is bringing out of hades His children, taking them to heaven. If you choose the former, Jesus is making a show of enemy forces His triumph over them bought by His death. Who are those enemy forces? That idea is probably best interpreted by Colossians 2:15, where it is said of the "principalities and powers"--the powers of sin and death--that "He made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in the cross."
The fact is, this event is not normative, that is, there were unusual things at His resurrection that we can't expect to build a theology of to answer "where do we go when we die?" around. Look at Matthew 27:52-53, when Jesus died:
and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; 53 and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.
Was that a repeatable event? Can we form a theology around Matthew 27:52 about when our bodies are raised from the dead? I'm saying these verses, Ephesians 4:8-10, could also have been a strange, non-theologically-based event too. In any event, since I suggested "flip a coin," I'm saying this is not a proof for either side, and is not relevant to forming a doctrine on for our deaths. Another verse loved by "straight to heavens:" Philippians 1:23:
For I am hard-pressed between the two, having a desire to depart and be with Christ, which is far better.
Paul is just wondering which is better--to live and support Christians, or to die and ultimately be with Christ. It does Not say that Paul expects immediately to be with Christ. Paul is not thinking doctrinally. So this verse does not lock the case for the "straight to heaven" group either.
Another favorite of theirs is Act 7:56, 59, at the martyrdom of Stephen:
and (Stephen) said, “Look! I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God!” 59 And they stoned Stephen as he was calling on God and saying, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.”
Well, this too could be a special case: Stephen is the first New Testament martyr; plus, he has given a severe admonishment to the Jews about their history defying God, and Jesus confirms him by showing up in a vision. Naturally, a man would react by saying, "Jesus, receive my spirit." Keep in mind, that's what a man is quoting, and doesn't have to be doctrine God can approve of for everyone. Think of the musings of Job; they're not all correct.
Finally, II Corinthians 5:8:
We are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord.
This is clearly the "straight to heaven" folks' favorite verse. But...when there are abundant verses telling us differently, should we believe that God changes the rules and only indicated the change clearly by this one verse? Would God do that on such an important teaching as "where we go when we die?" So we should consider opening our mind to a different definition of this verse. We really ought to consider the phrase doesn't really say that "one leads immediately to the other."
Finally, II Corinthians 5:8:
We are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord.
This is clearly the "straight to heaven" folks' favorite verse. But...when there are abundant verses telling us differently, should we believe that God changes the rules and only indicated the change clearly by this one verse? Would God do that on such an important teaching as "where we go when we die?" So we should consider opening our mind to a different definition of this verse. We really ought to consider the phrase doesn't really say that "one leads immediately to the other."
So what I see is, none of these verses lock down the "straight to heaven" idea. My eight verses on the intermediate state logically string together a solid case for the good side of hades, then later heaven at His second coming.
It's not a new idea. After all, it was believed by the Jews for a thousand years, then believed by the young church for another 600 years, then the Catholic church perverted it.
If you want to know more about what Scripture really says on How Do You Get Saved for Heaven, so you can graduate from earth eventually to heaven, you need to know that Catholics and many Protestants have that wrong too. I have a blog just on salvation, and another on initial and final salvation. Smarter, though, would be to read the Gospels over and over, noting what Jesus says on that very subject. He is quite clear.
Acknowledgement: David Bercot, CD, “Life After Death.” Scroll Publishing
No comments:
Post a Comment