There are three cultural and religious conditions in America
that mix together into a toxic formula that will severely reduce our power in the Lord,
unless we take deliberate action. Let’s
name them and tell what the admixture results are. Here are the components:
1. High relative
income. America doesn’t have the wealthiest
people on the planet, but it has the highest average disposable household
income, in 2013—if you are Caucasian.
America’s $60,256 is ‘way ahead of second highest among the measured nations, Luxembourg, whose median was $52,493.
2.
Belief in eternal security—“once saved, always
saved.” A rapidly-growing phenomenon.
3.
Belief that Christians will be raptured before
the seven-year “tribulation.” This is called the pre-trib rapture theory.
Again, a growing phenomenon. (A recent study of 1000 people show that twice as many believe in pre-trib as those who believe in post-trib rapture, or that the rapture is after the tribulation.)
So, what is the result, in most cases, from mixing these
three elements together? You won’t like what I think is the answer:
COMPLACENCY--“a feeling of being satisfied with how things are and not
wanting to try to make them better…especially when accompanied by
unawareness of actual dangers or deficiencies”
Not a good spiritual position, I think you will agree. Why do I believe complacency exists? The main reason is simple statistics. Jesus said, in Matthew 7:13-14:
“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go
in by it. 14 Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it
As
I said in an earlier blog ("Most Americans are Not Saved"), the word “few,” upon study, means as little
as 6 or 7 out of 100. So if America is average in its Christian ratio, 6 or 7--say 7--Americans out of 100 are going to heaven. Yet
the latest surveys reveal that 70% of Americans claim to be Christians, or
saved. So if you took 100 people, 70 would say they’re Christian, but only 7 of those might actually be saved. So out of every 10 people who say they are
saved, only one really is—the other 9 are deceived. They think they are Christian and going to heaven, but they are not. They are on the broad way to hell. Nine out of ten claiming to be Christian therefore have complacency--they have “unawareness of actual dangers,” do they not? Since this
‘unawareness” rate is so high (90% of those who think they’re heaven bound are
really on the way to hell); it seems to indicate complacency is toxic throughout the culture.
Unless
you want to make the argument that, oh yes, 70% of America is truly saved. We are ‘way above average in the world. In
fact, you’re saying that compared to the meaning of Jesus' word "few," supposedly
we’re not "few"--yes, we're 10 times the average. I would
like to give a simple argument that should crush such thoughts: Christianity turned the Roman Empire
upside-down between 30-300 AD. They went
from being a small band of hated “heretics” to being declared the state
religion. Huge social improvements were put into place. (You don't read about these things because your school history class "has to" avoid that.) Yet what percentage of the
population caused that? The answer,
according to best statistics, was shocking: Christians never got higher than 10%
of the population! With the power of God, they did it. So I ask you, what powerful social changes
have Christians done lately in America, with allegedly 7 times the ratio as
Rome? Few, is it not? This argument, as you see, doesn’t
hold water.
Now
you may argue, “Well, they were under persecution—this made them
stronger.” OK, that’s another way of
saying “Well, we’re weak now.” Exactly
what I maintain. Our weakness is due to complacency,
my friends. If we really stood up for Christ in a separated life, we would also experience huge persecution. But we're not. Oh, yes, a few people have indeed suffered--but few.
So I am maintaining that we have complacency. Now let’s look at the causes. I’m saying that the causes of our complacency
are the three above-mentioned American religious and cultural conditions. Let’s start our proof with:
High Relative Income. If they have any “religion” at all, the most-frequent assumption people make that have high income is this: “God gave me high income because He loves me. As Deuteronomy 28 shows, He blesses those who follow Him. So since I am blessed, He must love me, so I’m heaven bound.” Well, that’s Old Covenant. Jesus introduced the rules for rich people in the New Covenant. Let’s look at the new rule: Matthew 19:23-24:
High Relative Income. If they have any “religion” at all, the most-frequent assumption people make that have high income is this: “God gave me high income because He loves me. As Deuteronomy 28 shows, He blesses those who follow Him. So since I am blessed, He must love me, so I’m heaven bound.” Well, that’s Old Covenant. Jesus introduced the rules for rich people in the New Covenant. Let’s look at the new rule: Matthew 19:23-24:
Then Jesus said to His
disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to
enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go
through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
Let’s make sure we understand this: Jesus was saying, it’s more difficult for a rich
person to be saved than a middle or lower income person. So if the overall saved average in the world
is 7%, then America, with a larger number of richer people, would actually see
a lower than 7% saved rate. And
people who have a family disposable income of higher than $60,256 (see above),
are in particular danger. They get involved with the world, they love it. But Jesus says they can't also love God.
Now, of course, you may dispute all
this. You may say:
1.
Yes, we
have higher income. But I think we’re
saved anyhow. We accepted Christ. My possible responses to that argument:
a.
Praise the Lord if that’s really true; as Our
Lord said in Matthew 19:26: “With God
all things are possible.” But there’s a
few questions I’d like to ask:
b.
How much time do you spend praying over the
death and suffering of your brothers and sisters elsewhere in the world? Things are unbelievably bad for them in
China, Syria, Somalia, and North Korea, just to name a few. How much of your income do you donate to
their relief and missionary endeavors annually?
How much time do you reject the
purchase of unneeded material things so that you can give more to the Lord’s
work? And I do not mean your local
church here. The suffering is so much
greater elsewhere in the world. If none of these things have entered your mind,
are you really saved?
c.
Have you ever meditated on just exactly what
Jesus said in Matthew 6:19-20:
“Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth
and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; 20 but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither
moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal.
As I point out
in another blog (A Radical Truth: Part
I), Jesus is commanding us (“DO NOT”) not to save money beyond imminent use of
funds. This strongly suggests giving
away all income that we don’t really really need. This is in actuality advocating redistribution
of wealth—on a voluntary basis, of course. Done by Christians. After all:
What do men go to war for? Really,
isn’t it because other people have more than they? Such radical redistribution as Jesus suggests, such giving,
effectively snuffs this greedy homicidal impulse—and can save many of these
people for the Lord. And seriously reduce war and killing. Giving
sacrificially is the greatest witness for Christ of all!
d.
Yes, you accepted
Christ. But have you given gifts to the
Lord, as Galatians 5:22-23 says? Are you spending time reading Scripture to learn how to copy Jesus, how to obey His every commandment—and thus abiding in Him? As John 15:6 says:
If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them, and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.
I have a blog
on how to maintain salvation ("Getting to Heaven")—Scripture says we must endure to the end to be
saved. It would be a mistake to lean too much on
that past salvation experience, if not followed with appropriate deeds. Getting saved, then not radically changing your life, says you are not abiding in Christ--and you could be headed for being thrown in the fire.
2. Now, of course, you
may simply argue “I’m not rich. We make
$75,000 a year, and can barely get by.
So this isn’t relevant to me.” I
would say, your $75,000 puts you above average in the U.S., to begin with. But thinking on a worldwide scale, in the
long march of past history, as Jesus is addressing, you are one of the wealthiest
people who ever lived. There is a
special responsibility, a special burden, to go with this wealth—and you must
fight hard against deceit and complacency, which will come your way, which would tear you away from your
mission for the Lord. Consider Matthew
13:22, where the Sower has many failures and only a few successes; here is one
of his failures:
22 Now he who received seed
among the thorns is he who hears the word, and the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the
word, and he becomes unfruitful.
What kind of “deceitfulness”
did the Lord mean? How about “I am rich
because God loves me.” We’ve already
covered the falseness of that deceit. Yet rich people continue to complacently believe it. We should say, “God allowed me to be rich—what
does God want me to do with this special gift?”
Let’s move on
to the second cause of the cultural disaster known as Complacency: Belief in eternal security. Supposedly, all you have to do is say, “I was
saved at a youth camp in the summer of 2002.
So I’m saved forever. No need to
worry about hell.” So what do a lot of these people do? These “2002 savers,” say, get married, and if they
feel good about it, they stay married; if they don’t like it, they get
divorced. And remarried. Much of their conversation, even with
Christians, is functional—when they want a car, they talk up cars with
everybody. And so on through houses,
boats, jobs, how to get the “best” girl (her religious behavior ranks low on importance
for most--in fact, if she seems a "fanatic," it excludes her). God does not enter the
discussion. Retired people, I can tell you, we have
endless conversations about restaurants, how to save a dollar buying something,
golf game, etc. Or, for the younger, they
may live in fornication (sometimes even if they have young kids around), then they
“get saved,” but if they break up, and get into financial straits or
loneliness, they live with someone again.
Later they might get married. These
people pray—or appeal to God--only when they get desperate. They never read their Bibles, except in an
occasional short streak. They might get to church every other week, until they
can afford a boat, or get a job working Sundays. Then you better hope for a
Saturday night sermon. They are never torn about the possibility of hell for themselves, their family, or their friends. The point I am trying to make? God’s plan for what to do as a "new creation" are never
considered by the majority of those who believe in eternal security. Jesus’ commandments about forgiving, about
adultery and divorce, etc are never considered as serious enough to be on the pathway to hell.
So, abiding in Christ? Not happening. But a doubt about their salvation? Not a wisp of worry in their mind. It happened in 2002, don’t you know. It was a great event. So I’m Rock Solid about Eternal
Security. (Definition: I’m as complacent as I can be). Pastor told me so. Well, God bless that pastor. He will have to give an account for his
deception. Scripture is full of verses
that clearly indicate that security is conditional on holiness. I have a three-part blog on this one: Escaping Hell (Part 1), and Do Peter, James
and John…(Part 2) and Do Paul…(Part 3).
I know that you Eternal Security folks are ingrained in your beliefs,
but consider again that 9 out of 10 of those who think they are saved are not! What are the odds that you’re one of the 9…or
can you assume that you’re for sure the 1 in 10? This is heaven vs hell we’re talking about,
it’s worth a few hours of open-mindedness and reading all of Scripture, especially every word from Jesus, and praying for
His guidance.
Now we move to
the third of the triad causing our country’s massive complacency: The pre-trib rapture believers. (By the way, I used to be in all three of
these camps before. But I’ve always been
a reader, and He led me to some good reading material.) (Also, I have 3 blogs which can squash this pre-trib belief for the open-minded: "Scripture
says that Christians will go through—part 1"; "Rapture and God’s wrath—part 2";
and "How long to Christians have to suffer—part 3"). I only have space to give you one difficulty with the
pre-tribbers: Their theology has
Christians being raptured, without any indicators, before the end-times tribulation. The horrible things of those last tribulation days—wars,
famines, earthquakes, massive persecution and martyrdom—will happen on earth
while they’re enjoying heaven. The Holy
Spirit, a Comfort to His beloved and thus a witness of His grace to
non-believers, will be gone along with them when they are raptured. Thus, a “Christian” who believes this will be effectively saying, to his unsaved relatives and friends:
“You should be saved as I am. We
can leave this scene and leave non-believers to suffer the greatest misfortune
of their lives without us. When they
need us the most, Jesus takes us out of here.”
You know what the thinking non-believer will imagine when hearing this? “Oh, sure; you want me to believe in a
theology of abandoning people I care for, of complete selfishness. Is that what Christianity is? You can keep it, my un-friend.” Well, the truth is, the pre-trib theory is not a historical Christian
belief; the idea began spreading around 1830. It’s the opposite of the “post-trib” theology
that was believed by almost all "futurist" Christians for 1800 years before that. The
historical belief was, some Christians will have to hang around through the end times and suffer,
and giving their life for Him. So this
newer pre-trib idea says, in effect: For
the first 1800 years, when the greatest minds that Christians had, from men
close to Him, men who changed Rome, they all believed mistakenly, because they
believed Jesus had two Advents--birth and rapture. The
“truth” is, they say, Jesus is having 3 Advents—the middle one a secret rapture. Of course, there
isn’t a single solid Scripture to prove it, but if you twist some Scripture
like a pretzel, and compartmentalize and contextualize others, you’ve got this
great theology that people love to hear about, so it must be true! All those
1800 years, those guys were all wrong.
We have it right now—the subname for our theology is: Good Luck, the rest of you: We’re Outta Here! If that isn’t a Complacent theology (“I won’t
have to suffer, no sirree!”), I don’t know what is.
So there you have it. Three corrupting effects. Lots of complacency. Oh, you still don’t believe we’re in a
complacent period? I have a “closing
argument” thought for you: Have you
heard about the stat that “Christians” divorce at the same rate as non-Christians?
Here’s a shocking statement from Christianity
Today, 2/14/14:
Andrew Walker interviews Dr. Bradford Wilcox,
Director of the National Marriage Project, and asks him the question,
"Are religious conservatives really divorcing more than religious
liberals, or more than people who have no religious affiliation at all?"
Dr. Wilcox answers,
Up to a
point, yes. The article finds that conservative Protestants, and counties with
higher shares of conservative Protestants, are indeed more likely to
divorce—compared to Americans in other mainstream traditions, from mainline
Protestantism to Mormonism to Catholicism.
Thus, conservative (i.e., evangelical) “Christians” have a
higher divorce rate than “mainline” (i.e., liberal) Christians. That’s a
shocker by itself, saying that the supposedly more committed Christians divorce at a higher rate. The article goes on to
say,
…A new article by sociologist Charles Stokes in www.family-studies.org suggests that the problem here is mainly with nominal conservative
Protestants—those who attend (church) rarely or never. It's these nominal conservative Protestants who are
much more likely to divorce.
That word “nominal” (“in name only”) seems to back my claim
that most of those who claim to be saved aren’t. By the way--aside from my personal experience, here’s the reason I keep harping on the
subject of divorce. What did Jesus command? In Matthew 5:32:
whoever divorces his wife for any reason except sexual
immorality causes her to commit adultery; and whoever marries a woman
who is divorced commits adultery.
You would have to conclude that there’s a lot of adultery
going on in America among “Christians,” is there not? Now, what does Galatians 5:19-21 say?
Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery,
fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry,
sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish
ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy,
murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you
beforehand, just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not
inherit the kingdom of God.
Think about this: God hates divorce so much that He places it
in the same camp as the idolaters, the sorcerers, the murderers—all these terrible people, including divorcers who remarry (if
unrepentant) are going to hell! Were
Jesus and Paul blunt about hating divorce?
Yes. But do we get it? No; we have people all over the place who
choose temporary residence in a new marriage, hoping for a little more bliss in
this life—and they are trading it for an eternity in hell! Bad trade, folks! Do our pastors get it? No. For the most part, they insist God will forgive you, without demanding that you see what
danger you’re in, or even asking you for repentance. No church discipline, no loss of Communion under more liberal popes.
All this sounds like
“unawareness of actual dangers,” does it not? Well, that’s the definition of
complacency. I’ll say the statistic one
more time: 9 out of 10 people who think
they’re going to heaven are actually going to hell. Are you sure you’re not one
of the 9? Take some time to study the
Scriptures, ask God to open your eyes, read my blogs on these dangerous
beliefs. May God bless you.
Good food for thought!
ReplyDeleteGood food for thought!
ReplyDelete