Ezek 33:7 I have made you a watchman...therefore you shall hear a word from My mouth and warn them for Me.

Friday, May 20, 2022

Victory Over the Taliban

 


Ezek 33:7 I have made you a watchman...therefore you shall hear a word from My mouth and warn them for Me.

Saturday, February 29, 2020

Victory over the Taliban

In a recent blog I mentioned a Bible verse that had “hyperbole.” Here's Luke 14:26 to illustrate the point:

“If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple.

Hyperbole, then, is willingness to go to extremes to crush a sin and obey Christ. But the example is ridiculous to emphasize the principle.  Jesus didn't mean we should hate our parents--but if our love for our Savior is great enough, we get the point of what He is saying.  Now I would like to tell you a story—a true story recorded in Voice of the Martyrs—about what life can be like when you follow Jesus—in Afghanistan. When your father is a top Taliban leader. It is a perfect illustration of a hyperbole.

This story is recent, so the names have been changed to protect the innocent. The protagonists will be named “John” and “Mary.” In the beginning of our story, John was 23, had a wife and baby son, and taught Islamic theology in his home town in Afghanistan. He traveled to Saudi Arabia three years ago on a hajj, a pilgrimage to Mecca. As he slept on the way overnight, John dreamed of a man with shining face and shining white clothes, who said, “My son, I see that you are seeking after me, but the real faith is not in Mecca, and I am not there.” This made John think as he performed the rituals of the hajj; people were really hypocritical in worship. In another night on the trip, John had a vision (not a dream) of the man in white. “Who are you?” he asked the man in the vision. “I want to talk to you because I love you,” the man replied. “If I tell you who I am, you will lose seven things. You will lose the Quran and Mohammed. You will lose your parents. You will lose your child that you love. You will lose your relatives and everyone will hate you. You will lose your wealth. You will be homeless and they will drive you from your country. If you don’t accept the loss of these seven things, you won’t be able to find Me anymore. Before you were born, I had plans for you. What is your choice?”

He couldn't believe it later, because he said "If you tell me your name, I will believe in you.”

The Man replied, “I am your God; I am Jesus Christ.”

Jesus touched John’s head and then he fell asleep. When he woke up, he felt completely different. “I was completely cleansed from the inside, and I felt like I was a newborn baby.” John immediately abandoned the rest of the hajj and flew home. He called his father from the airport in Kabul. Upon arriving home, “Why did you come back?” his father asked angrily. “There are still three days left for the hajj.”
“I found my God. And I don’t believe in your Allah.”
“Whom did you find?”
“I believe in Jesus Christ,” John replied.

“You are an infidel!” his father shouted as he began to beat him. “If you speak to people like this, I will cut out your tongue.”
“I want to tell people,” John said. “I don’t want to stop.”
“If you tell people you have become a Christian, I will burn you, your wife and little son!”

John’s father threw him into a basement bunker on the property that was used for detaining and torturing anti-Taliban insurgents. He was held there for nearly 18 months, enduring repeated torture and pressure to give up his faith in Jesus. No one in the family knew where John was—his father told John’s wife Mary that he was sent to Egypt to study. John was fed almost nothing. His captors put snakes in the basement, but they either died or had no effect on him when they bit him. They also released a vicious guard dog, but it immediately became friendly with John. They even tried to crucify John upside down, but failed.

Throughout John’s long, lonely months in the bunker, he often had dreams of Jesus. “God gave me power, and told me, ‘I am with you.’” His father finally released him with a warning. “I agreed that I would not talk about Jesus to him, but I did not promise that I would not speak to anyone about Jesus,” John said.

When John walked into his home that day, after he cleaned up, he went to his wife, Mary. He wanted to tell her about Jesus. “Mary, I have to tell you something.” He said “I have to tell you something first,” she said. She told him that throughout the time he was missing, she had had dreams of Jesus. Jesus comforted her and promised her that her husband would come home. Mary had come to believe in Jesus, but she had not told the family. John joyfully told Mary everything, and the two cried with happiness.

John didn’t stop talking about Jesus. “I began to tell my mother everything about Jesus, and then all my family believed in Jesus. But they didn’t tell anyone because of fear.” John’s mother, sisters, aunts, and cousins all began to follow Jesus. Each night, when his father was gone, John would teach them what he learned through the ministry of the Holy Spirit. Many in the community also learned of John’s new faith, but by miracle, no one knew it.

A few months later, when Mary became pregnant with her second child, John’s father instructed them to name the baby Sayeed Muhammed. “No” said John. “I don’t want to give my son an Islamic name. I am naming him Isa” (Jesus). His father exploded in anger and began beating John in the head. “Shut up, you infidel!” Then he threw John back into the bunker. When John’s father told Mary’s father (a mullah, an Islamic leader, and Taliban member), her father confronted her. “Your husband is an infidel,” he said. “You should abort the baby.”
“I believe in Jesus Christ too,” Mary told him. Her father slammed her forehead on the ground and hit her in the mouth, breaking her teeth. Then he began punching her in the abdomen. Then he tossed her limp body into the bunker with John. Her face was severely bruised from the beating.

While they were in the bunker, John’s father took their little son with him to meet some Taliban leaders in another city. Those leaders blamed John’s father for allowing his son to convert, and they ordered him to kill John. Mary’s mother heard about the plan and called John’s mother. She ran to the bunker and broke down the door. She handed John $2400, his computer, and a suitcase. “Please leave Afghanistan” she told them. “I’ll take care of your son.”

Although they didn’t want to leave their son, John and Mary knew that if they stayed at all, they would be killed. They fled. After three days and some distance, John found a Wi-fi “Skype” connection and called his mother. There was his 2-year old son sitting on her lap. John could see his son on the video screen but her head was out of picture range. His son cried, “Papa! I am fine. Please come back. I miss you.” John’s mother also encouraged them to come home, saying the danger had passed. After the call, when John and Mary made plans to return, John’s mother called back again. “Don’t come back!” she warned. “The Taliban were standing right here when we were talking earlier, with a gun against my head. You must leave immediately.” John and Mary went on the run again, going as far as they could before the money ran out. They tried to register as refugees, but local Muslim workers refused to accept them because they were Christian converts.

But Mary was in severe pain, and could hardly move, having never healed from her father’s beating. A doctor gave them the bad news. The child in Mary’s womb had died, and Mary could die too if the fetus were not removed immediately. The procedure would cost $5,000. John didn’t have any money. That evening at home, John cried while Mary slept. As he prayed, he felt the Lord leading him to anoint his wife with oil and pray over her. John did, and prayed that Jesus would save his unborn son.  Eventually he fell asleep.

The next morning, Mary was up and around, so they went to the doctor. He delivered some incredible news. “The baby is alive! How is this possible?” John shared his whole testimony with the doctor and told him that he had prayed in the name of Jesus that his son would be healed. “It is a miracle” the doctor said. “I’ve never seen something like this in my life.” The doctor called others from the clinic into the room to witness this. Mary and John shared their story with them too. Several people in the room believed in Christ that day.

The Taliban had continued to stalk John. He received threatening phone calls from radicals in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and even Saudi Arabia. The Taliban issued a demand: they would return to Afghanistan and recant their Christian faith, or their 2-year old son would be killed. The deadline was October 4, 2013. John did everything he could. He spoke to the embassy. He went to the U.N. Refugee Agency. But no one would help. A few days later, John’s father turned the little boy over to the Taliban—in order to restore his honor among his terrorist friends.

A relative called Mary and John with the horrible news that their older son died. “The Taliban put a picture of my dead son on their website” John said. The murder of the little boy shocked John’s mother and five sisters. They asked how the Islamic faith could justify killing a child because of his father’s actions. They told John’s father that his acts were shameful, and they then told their whole village that they, too, were following the Jesus Christ that John had shared with them.

“Very soon, we learned from my wife’s brother that my father killed his wife and my five sisters and buried them,” John said. “We believe him, because we have not heard or seen anything of my sisters.” Although Mary’s brothers were Taliban members, they disagreed with the leadership about killing John’s son. And then, when the Taliban and John’s father killed John’s sisters, Mary’s brothers initiated a gunfight with other Taliban members. The body of her oldest brother was found days later with one hand cut off, but her youngest brother managed to escape.

When Mary’s father found out that Mary's mother was the one who had revealed the Taliban’s plot to kill the couple to John, he killed her by feeding her rat poison. John and Mary could only weep and pray, saying, ”God, you know.”

In November 2013, John and Mary were baptized. In February 2014 little Isa was born, perfectly healthy. Because of continual threats from the Taliban, the family was forced to move six times in eight months. John continued to share Jesus with everyone, often speaking with Afghan tradesmen working in the markets. He once prayed with a medical assistant about her infertility, and later she called to tell him she had just learned that she was pregnant. John began using the internet to minister to Afghans around the world, including his former Muslim students in Afghanistan. Many have turned to Christ through John’s powerful witness. John continues to teach new converts. He leads hours of internet worship services with small groups several times a week.

In late 2014, John, Mary, and Isa were accepted as refugees in a Western country. And John continues sharing about Christ. “Every second I work for God I want more people to see Jesus. I don’t want people to see me; I want them to see God. I lost everything, so I want to tell people about Jesus. God said He made many houses in heaven; he needs people in them.”

So, since many of John’s beloved relatives were murdered—how, you ask, is my title “victory” over the Taliban? The answer is: Many souls were won to the Lord. John will see his relatives in heaven again. None of their lives meant so much to them—or him—such as to sway them from their indomitable love for Our Savior. They loved Him so much that their feelings for each other seemed like hate in comparison. Our Lord gave up His life for us. What should we be willing to do for Him?   What Jesus spoke was hyperbole in Luke 14:26 above, but John and Mary were the perfect examples of the depth of its meaning.

Acknowledgement Voice of the Martyrs, January, 2015

No comments:

Post a Comment

Wednesday, May 11, 2022

Dr. MacArtur vs. Easy Believism

 

There is nothing more important than soteriology—the doctrine of salvation, or how we can know from Scripture if we’re going to heaven.  As anybody who reads my blogs know, I am a long-time foot-stomper on how the doctrine of salvation has been weakened.  But I dug up a book where Dr. John MacArthur, one of my favorite blunt-edge guys, feels the same way, and expresses his agitation much better than I could.  After all, he’s pastor of a church for 50 years, chancellor emeritus of The Master’s University, and editor and author of 150 books.  You will find, as I did, that much of this battle we outline below is a battle of words.  If you can change the meaning of a word that expresses a necessity for salvation, or if you can eliminate that expression entirely, then you have won half the battle.  So Satan—and his followers—have found.  So let’s get into just the first chapter of his book, prophetically written from 1988, “The Gospel According to Jesus.”  

His introduction bemoans the gospel presentations today (“ask Jesus into your heart,” etc). None of them is Biblical—the gospel Jesus proclaimed was a call to discipleship, a call to follow Him in submissive obedience.  In truth, the cost to follow Him is high, the way is narrow—and few find it (Matthew 7:13). Sadly, the verse points out that the majority of people are headed for hell, whether they know it or not. The verse is a warning call.  As he puts it, “present day evangelicalism ignores those warnings.” 

The first serious break from Scripture was from an alleged evangelist, Lewis Sperry Chafer in his book in 1918 (note:  Chafer was a founder and the first president of Dallas Theological Seminary, where it can be easily proved that this heretical doctrine has been taught there).  The theory goes like this:  there are two classes of Christians, carnal and spiritual.  As he wrote in his book, “the ‘carnal’ Christian is characterized by a walk that is on the same plane as that of the ‘natural’ (i.e. unsaved) man.”  Dr. MacArthur points out that “that was a foreign concept to most Christians in Dr. Chafer’s generation, but it has become a central premise for a large segment of the church today.”  He argues that Scripture clearly is opposite.  For instance, I John 3:10: 

 In this the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is he who does not love his brother.

Of course, a Christian cannot be perfectly righteous, and will stumble, but as the great theologian B.B. Warfield put it, “the remainders of the flesh in the Christian do not constitute his characteristic.  He is in the Spirit and is walking, with however halting steps, by the Spirit.”  The Christian wants to come back to God when he sins. He wants to confess.  Such is abiding (a requirement to remain Christian, in John 15:1-6).  It is to ALL Christians that Scripture says, “sin shall not have dominion over you.”  (Romans 6:14).  But the easy doctrine (“I can still be carnal”) won the people’s love. Many people think they are Christians but have no interest in holiness, in abiding in Christ.  The carnal life is good enough for them.  What do we learn?  That false prophecies move fastest into acceptance, through the pastors who were taught this heresy, to the people.  

Another crack in the surface of soteriology was forwarded by dispensationalists (who believe that God acts differently in different ages).  They assert that the Old Testament was the “age of law.”  The New Testament is the “age of grace.”  God is kinder, He is different, now.  Chafer wrote, “the age before the cross…represent the exercise of (i.e., God’s judgement was based on) pure law, while the (current) period represents the exercise of pure grace.”  Grace, of course, has a new meaning:  it means “God is kinder” to them.  That’s not the meaning of the word at all, but who cares?  Sounds better.  To attack this malign heresy is easy:  first, God doesn’t change.   Salvation has always been, whether Old or New time periods, by grace through faith, not by the works of the law.  Galatians 2:16:

a man is not justified by the works of the law but by faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law; for by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified

Well, what saved them in the Old Testament, without faith in Christ?  It was faith in God.  Let’s consider Abraham, who lived in what they call the law-period. In Genesis 15, God promises him many descendants—but he’s 85 years old.  But he believed God for a miracle. He doubted, but he always came back to God.  He got what God promised.  Note Genesis 15:6:

And he believed in the Lord, and He accounted it to him for righteousness.

Abraham was right with God because of his faith. So it wasn’t any different in the Old Testament than in the New.  It’s all the same—belief by faith in Yahweh, or belief in Jesus Who also was God.  But these clear verses hasn’t stopped those of the “two age systems” to warp it into believing that God was harsh in the Old, but changes the rules and becomes compassionate in the New.  A problem for them, though, was in Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, where He set a higher bar than the Law had set for God’s judgement.  They had to discount that Sermon, or else God’s judgement of sin would be harsher than the Law.  In the Law, a sex act outside of marriage was adultery:  But Jesus said, to look on a woman to lust after her was adultery in our heart (Matthew 5:28).  And Jesus said, murderous thoughts in our mind, such as being angry with our brother without a cause, would be judged as murder.  And He gave more of the same in that Sermon.  The point is, the dispensationalists considered these as impossible—so they announced that the whole Sermon on the Mount was for the future Kingdom age (yay, another age), where Jesus will rule for 1000 years.  It wasn’t anything to get seriously concerned about now. I guess we should say, “Whew!  I guess carnal living is still OK.”  But Dr. MacDonald saw through their fog, and called this a “lamentable hermeneutic.”  He said it “emasculates the message of the gospels.” 

Further weakening of salvation theology continued on with those arguing the dangers of “Lordship salvation.”  Even as early as Luke 2:11, Jesus is called Savior and Lord. Along with many other Scriptures in the same vein, these two clearly go together. We must do honor to Him on both counts to be saved.  He not only saved us from hell, He saved us from sin’s power.  He is to be Lord of our lives, and we are to read His Word and listen to the Spirit to make decisions to be in His perfect will. 

Again, the dispensationalists are fighting for weakness here: They claim it is possible to receive Christ as Savior, yet reject Him as Lord.  You have an option to say “maybe later” on Lordship when you are “saved.”  As if.  To some reputed “theologians,” that is the norm for salvation:  to add such a requirement as Lordship is to “add works.”  So I guess, then, that professing obedience in behavior to Christ in our life is “adding works.”  But get real.  James has a whole chapter on how faith, without works, is dead.  It is not faith at all.  Remember our brief discussion of the narrow gate above, and few getting into heaven?  Let’s look at Luke 13:24:

“Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I say to you, will seek to enter and will not be able.

Now if there were ever a dirty “works” word, “Strive” would be it.  Yet Jesus quotes it in connection of salvation. There are many other verses that echo the same theme. The problem is, when Protestant theology was first formed, the Reformers (Luther and Calvin) hated all the sacraments, all the works, that Catholics put on salvation. The Catholics had martyred thousands of them, so the hate was real.  But they put a new definition of “works” that is way too sensitive, and ignored a huge body of Scripture (such as the above) that points out the importance of works, for fruits.  Luther hated the book of James, calling it “a book of straw,” so he ignored it.  Because James, under God, said that faith without following works was dead.  But you cannot ignore one book, or thirty other verses, to “get what you want” soteriology to be. So they went too far to expunge what they call “works.”  With some churches, if you reveal that you have rules in your family about limiting TV watching, or requiring prayer before every meal, they will call you “legalistic.”  Let us not run so far from the Catholics, all you Protestants, that we swing the pendulum away so far from works so as to enter a fuzzy, non-existent world of complacency—do anything you want, pay no attention to laws (they are all Old stuff, right?  Uh, no, Jesus had a few clarification commands refining Law).  No, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we must strive.  We must say “no” a lot—to the temptations of the world.  We must abide in Christ.  When Paul says, “by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified,” he is simply saying, we aren’t saved by works.  God looks to our faith.  Good works follow faith, though. We will have an urge to follow Christ in our actions.  Such good works are called “fruit.”  Without fruit, we are NOT ON the VINE (John 15:1-6).  A.W. Tozer put it well:  “The Lord will not save those He cannot command.” 

Talking about the necessity of fruits, there was also a fight over the word “repentance.”  The “weaker salvation” theologians have argued that repentance is not necessary in salvation:  It stresses “works.”  A dirty word to them.  But the Greek root of repent is metanoia, defined as “to perceive afterwards, implying a change in mind.”  (Vine’s Expository Dictionary of N.T. Words).  He adds that in Scripture, it is almost always used as an exhortation, and a change for the better. Also note that the word repent is the first word used by John the Baptist, by Jesus and by Peter at the start of their ministries (Matthew 3:2, 4:17, and Acts 2:38).  They wanted a change in heart about sin. Or you’re not saved.  By placing the word at the very beginning of their preachment, the concept was important in the gospel. And note what John the Baptist says as proof that you really repented in Matthew 3:8:

 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance

 This clearly shows that repentance is tied to equally important fruits in salvation.

Yet another battle arose on the word “discipleship.”  Again, it so goes that there are two classes of Christians:  ‘believers’ and ‘true disciples.’  Dr. MacArthur, in attacking yet another split, quotes the Great Commission, Matthew 28:19-20.  Note that His disciples were not asked to go out and bring everyone to salvation:

Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”

Dr. MacArthur quotes appropriately from James M. Boice (by the way, if these names are all unknown to you, it just proves that I’m older.  You can read up on them in Wikipedia). Boice wrote: 

“In days of persecution, those who are in the process of becoming Christians have to count the cost of discipleship carefully before taking up the Cross…But in good times, the cost (of following Christ) does not seem so high, and people take the name of Christ without undergoing the radical transformation of life that true conversion implies.”

Boice bluntly called this two classes idea “defective theology.” 

I trust you might have noticed a trend in the heretical theologies that have weakened salvation doctrine.  All of them want to give you a choice of one of two ways to go, after being “saved”:  you can have the option to carry on the same life as before, just with the added “fire insurance” policy of salvation for heaven through mental assent that, yeah, Jesus died for my sins.  Thanks, Jesus.  They then give you the other option, the tough life, which is rejected by most people.  It says:  Leave it to the zealots to claim to follow moral law, or Lordship, or discipleship, or the saintly life.  Most “saved” people choose the easy way; they still like the carnal life, not trying for the impossible like the Sermon on the Mount.  The choice is to their destruction.

The Catholics have a similar theme in their doctrine.  If you are a true disciple, or saint, you go directly to heaven.  The rest of us, who want to enjoy the dung of carnality, as long as we commit no mortal sin, we can go to purgatory, and get purged of all of that scum later, and then maybe we can eventually go to heaven.  So you see, the “two-way” soteriology is in there too.

Well, Jesus had a Word for that.  Note the danger in His words:  Matthew 7:21-23:

“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’

In “lawlessness,” there’s the final word that Jesus still pays attention to moral law.  And in the phrase “does the will of My Father,” you have the final word that there is an element of works in final salvation:  we must “do the will” of God.

Holiness, obeying the moral Law, Old Testament or New, is essential.  Giving your life to Christ. It’s not really asking too much, since Scripture shows how much He loved you (He died to get your sin out of the way so you can get reconciled to God). Discipleship is essential.  Lordship is essential.  Repentance from sin is essential.

Got it?  More than you thought?  Well, as Jesus said, count the cost.  Luke 14:28:

 For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not sit down first and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it

The parable is for those who realize, from Scripture, that it’s truly a narrow way to final salvation. But the choice, as the verses point out, is….heaven or hell.  I can’t overstate how important THAT decision is.  Well, you read it here, straight from Scripture.  And crusty Dr. MacDonald.  God awaits your decision.

Tuesday, May 3, 2022

Another Way to Look at the Life of Joseph

 

Another great sermon by Voddie Baucham:

Pastor Baucham begins his study of Joseph by quickly recounting Joseph’s history.  Among Jacob’s 12 sons, Joseph was loved most by his father--because he and Benjamin were the only sons of Jacob’s true love, Rachel.  (Keep in mind, he had had two wives and two concubines). He gave Joseph a special robe as well.  Joseph had dreams; in one of them, his brothers and father bowed down to him, which he made an unfortunate decision by telling this to his 11 brothers.  They hated him, and in their jealousy decided to kill him—but they ultimately sold him into slavery.  His new master was Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh.  Potiphar eventually let Joseph rule his household because he had integrity--and his master was blessed when Joseph was around. But Joseph was seduced by his master’s wife, and he said “how can I do this great wickedness against God?”  When he rejected her, she told Potiphar that he attempted to rape her.  He was thrown into jail.  But he endured, still was honest, and he was eventually allowed to run the jailer’s duties—now all the prisoners were under his authority. Two dreams by prisoners who had offended the Pharoah were brought to him for interpretation. He told them God can give an answer, and indeed, God told him that one would die, the other would be elevated to the Pharaoh’s side again.  Both those came true, but the one who rose to serve Pharoah forgot about him.  Not a word is said about any bitterness that most of us would feel if we were Joseph.  “Bad luck” seems to stalk him.  But he always had integrity and testimony for God, even though he was still stuck in jail. 

But his opportunity came.  The Pharaoh had two dreams, and the servant remembered what Joseph did and told Pharoah.  He was pulled out of prison, cleaned up and the Pharoah told him that he must tell him what he dreamed, and the interpretation of them. God gave it to him, and he gave full credit to God, and explained it as seven good years of harvest, followed by seven years of famine.  Pharoah believed him.  Joseph was emboldened to suggest that they should save 20% of the surpluses the first seven years, and suggested how they could do that. The Pharaoh liked his administrative style and boldness, and incredibly put him, a Hebrew, a prisoner, in charge of the entire kingdom’s economy, the world’s greatest kingdom to that point in time.  He was Pharaoh’s right-hand man, second in command only to himself, and gave him his signet ring, beautiful clothes, a gold chain and a wife, who produced two sons for him.    

At this point, Pastor Baucham, says, this is how most people tell the “moral to the story” to their children:  Because he was faithful to God, even in difficulty, God eventually blessed him.  And here he is, as proof, with power and position.  “But,” says Pastor Baucham, “what if I told you that that was not the point of Joseph’s story?  What if I told you that that is almost the opposite of the point?”  He then relates what God really wants us to understand, with Scriptural proof to back it up.  It ends up being a greater moral to the story, and is one of the many treasures I have gotten from Pastor Baucham.   He calls it the “Inigo Montoya” twist on the story (from “Princess Bride”) that Baucham is so good at.  Paraphrased: “You keep on telling this story; I do not think it means what you think it means.” 

He begins his explanation on the real moral to the story with how Genesis is a series of “this is the generations of…” followed by a name, like Noah or Shem.  Those are called toledoth in Hebrew.  There are 11 of those in Genesis; the last one, in Genesis 37:2, is NOT the generations of Joseph, who we think is the main character in this phase.  No, it is the generations of Jacob. So, based on this, the story of Joseph is not about Joseph, it’s about Jacob. 

Another way that might pique your interest is this:  there are 3 themes that recur throughout the Old Testament.  They are land, seed, and covenant.  Even in the Creation account, “the generations (history) of heavens and the earth.” The phrase “He created the heavens and the earth” is the land.  Then He creates the plants from their seeds.  Then when you get Adam, He makes a covenant with him. 

In the Fall of Adam and Eve, we see this trio too:  Man is kicked out of the land (Eden), and God tells of a promised Seed in making another covenant.  It is most obvious with Abram:  God promises (covenants with) him a nation (seed), and he is to move to take up possession of a land.  Finally, as the former slaves move through the desert in Exodus, they (the seed of Abraham) are moving to the promised, or covenanted, land.  So let’s read Joseph’s story with these facts primarily in view.

Also, Pastor Baucham urges us to also see the irony in what we’re reading from Genesis 41:37 on. When you see it, you get the point of what God wants you to really learn from this story.  It goes like this:

In Genesis 41:37 we see how the Pharaoh believed Joseph’s interpretation of his dreams. “Can we find a man like this in whom is the spirit of God?”  This is ironic:  Because his brothers hated him for his interpretation of another dream (that they would bow before him).  His interpretation to his brothers eventually was right, and it was from God.  But they did NOT believe it or accept him because of it.   Now he stands before a pagan king, who DOES believe him.  That’s irony.  Pharoah recognizes when he sees something supernatural, too. But the Jews did not accept that possibility, and here they were the covenanted people of a supernatural God.  All of this does not make the children of Israel look good. 

Secondly, whether Pharoah knew it or not, every house that Joseph serves prospers.  Note that in 41:40, Pharaoh said, “You shall be over my house.”  So Pharoah is now going to be the latest one to get some blessing.  The thing is, whose house is Joseph supposed to be prospering? Jacob’s.  So we conclude: “Wrong house.”   This also is not a good thing.   Thirdly, Pharaoh said in verse 41, “I have set you over all the land of Egypt.”  Remember our three things:  land, seed, covenant.  What land is Joseph supposed to be in?  Canaan, the land of promise.  And what land is the theological opposite of Canaan?  Egypt.  So now it’s wrong house, wrong land. And v. 42, “he clothed him in garments of fine linen.” Think of Joseph’s previous special robe. So we conclude:  Wrong robe.  And if it looks like Pharaoh has adopted him—which means, for present purposes, he has the wrong father.  Again, not good. Is there any way, with these hints, that Moses, the writer, is trying to say, “This is a blessing—Joseph’s got everything right, he’s on top of the world.” Absolutely not.  Finally, in verse 45, Pharaoh called Joseph Zaphnath-Paaneah.  It means God (the Egyptian god) speaks and he lives. (Oh, I forgot to tell you:  If the Pharoah’s soothsayers had the wrong interpretation, or couldn’t guess the dream, they would die. No pressure on Joseph, right?  But he stayed calm, because he was confident in God.)  Anyway, it was the Wrong name, giving credit to their god. He has a covenant name that identifies him with the people of the real God.  Now a pagan king gave him a pagan name. This pagan name points to his affiliation with a pagan god.  Then he gave him in marriage to the daughter of the priest of On (another pagan god).  Wrong wife. Perhaps you’ve read how Ezra, among others, urged the people to put away these foreign wives (Ezra 10:3).  And how Solomon got in trouble by doing that, too.  Not because of their being foreign, or having a different ethnicity.  But because of their worship of false gods—it would be marriage to an unbeliever.  Which God was against.  We agree with those Ezra statements, so how do we tell our kids, on the Joseph story, “Yes, kids, you too can be like Joseph.” Sarcastically, Dr. Baucham says what we should point out to the kids: “If, children, you’re faithful, you can end up in the wrong land, with the wrong father, with the wrong robe and the wrong wife, and wrong name.”  Of course, none of this was Joseph’s choice.  He was in the center of God’s will, whether he knew it or not—he was where God wanted him to be.

Well, if you’re not convinced of this new look at Joseph’s endgame—would you believe it if Joseph says it?  Beginning in Genesis 37:50, it says “To Joseph were born two sons…he called the name of his firstborn Manasseh; “for God has made me forget all my hardship and all my father’s house.“ And the name of the second he called Ephraim:  “For God has caused me to be fruitful in the land of my affliction.”  The names of these sons make my same point.  Note that he gave his sons Hebrew names, not Egyptian—he gave his seed, covenantal names.  He was thinking of Canaan, his real home, when he said Egypt was “the land of my affliction.”  Anything short of God’s will was an affliction. 

Now you have the three:  Land, covenant, seed.   Let’s look carefully at their names, again.  Dr. Baucham comes up with a loose but accurate translation of Manasseh--it means, “I let that go.”  He imagines a conversation on the street.  Let’s say an Egyptian friend greets Joseph and says, “boy, you’re living the dream now.” At some point he tells him the son’s name is Hebrew, and says, “Pharaoh gets to change my name, but he doesn’t get to name my son.  He’s a child of the covenant.” The friend says, “why would you name him after the Hebrew people who abandoned you?”  His answer: “Because I let that stuff go.”  Even though they sold him into slavery.  Joseph had no bitterness.  He still chose to be identified with the covenant people of God rather than Egypt, which, despite showering him with wealth and position, he knows were still the enemies of God.  All pagan gods are demons, and they are God’s enemies.  He stayed faithful to God, despite how he could present a good case to God for complaint.  He chose to always look through the promises of the covenant, not through the lens of his past pain.  He let that stuff go.

Some of us need a Manasseh, too.  We are holding onto things, and are not looking at ourselves as redeemed people of the covenant, but as damaged people from our past.  You need to let that stuff go. “But I have trust issues, I have been poor.”  Manasseh.  Let it go.  That’s not who you are. The blood of Jesus can cover that.

Just in case they didn’t get the message, his second son means, “God has made me fruitful in the land of my affliction.” You might ask, if you were Egyptian, “didn’t our nation bless you?  And wouldn’t the land of affliction be the place where they hated you, and were willing to murder you?”  No, because Joseph knew that he was still part of God’s covenant people, and the place for him to be is the land of the covenant.  “I don’t care how much I obtained wealth here; there is no wealth like being in the presence of Yahweh, our Lord God.  Anything out of God’s presence is affliction.”  Dr Baucham then spoke personally: he is spending the majority of his time in Zambia, and he is asked repeatedly why he chose Zambia over the U.S.(he was born in Los Angeles).  He answer:  I am looking for a city with foundations, whose builder and maker is God.  And until I get there, wherever I live is the land of my affliction. (He is speaking of heaven vs. earth). This is not my home.  This is not as good as it gets.  Our best day here pales in comparison to any day in glory.   He concludes that Joseph is doing what we should be doing:  this present evil world is the land of our affliction, but I’m doing everything in my power to be a blessing to this land, because it’s where God has me right now. We man our post, and advance His kingdom wherever the Lord asks us to be.  Never get too comfortable; remember it is the land of our affliction. Paul talks about this tension, too, when he quotes: for me to live is Christ; to die is gain.

So, Joseph doesn’t choose the path the way most people would, nor does he fight the path God put him on. His faith is deep and unmovable, even though he can’t see the external blessings of God’s covenant. 

Did you know that, despite his character, Joseph is not the promised seed from whom the Redeemer would come?  Of Jacob’s sons, God picks Judah as the promised seed.  Joseph had an important role—he preserved the promised seed, from famine.  All Joseph knows is, obedience and the resulting peace are his friends.  Peace, for him, is in the midst of God’s will. God’s will is sometimes unknown; He makes a promise, and definitely has exciting ways to complete it!

So what’s the end of the Joseph story? From Genesis 42ff, Joseph’s brothers show up to get food.  Joseph recognizes them, but they don’t recognize him.  Joseph will test his brothers.  First, remember that Joseph was the son of Jacob’s favorite wife.  The other son born to her was Benjamin; but he didn’t see Benjamin, and assumes Benjamin didn’t travel with them.  (Maybe Jacob wanted to protect him).  Joseph doesn’t know for sure if he is alive or dead; who knows, he wonders, maybe they did the same treatment to Benjamin that they did to him.  As a plan to see Benjamin, he insists that they come back with Benjamin, and he tests their character by holding hostage one of them—would they abandon that hostage?  When they return with Benjamin, as a final test, he tricks them into thinking that they have stolen his goods, and then insists that he keep Benjamin as penalty.   He tells the rest of them that they may now leave; Benjamin will remain as slave.  But Judah distinguishes himself by saying, take me instead of him (Gen. 44:18ff). 

 Now Joseph reveals himself, and when they recover, they thought, Dad might die, but we’re going to die first! (They thought Joseph would seek revenge).  But Joseph had great mercy, and finally reveals himself.  He said, “God sent me here before you to preserve life….to preserve a remnant (or posterity) for you…it was not you who sent me here, but God…he made me lord of all Pharaoh’s house….to save you.” 

Think much about Joseph’s condition, and how God blessed him spiritually, giving him peace and contentment no matter his surroundings. Can you apply this to your own life, by building up his many godly character traits?  Are you a real member of the kingdom of God, and how our real goal and real treasure is in heaven, and in the center of God’s will?

Joseph is considered a type of Christ, in being rejected by his brothers, but saving his elect anyways, from dying from famine.  I hope you like this new way to see Joseph.