You should read my Summary of Disk 1 before reading this. A very brief summary of it: True salvation from hell is in two phases: When you exercise faith and repentance (and baptism, another CD), plus works, or fruit, showing obedience to your Lord, then you are truly saved. Ignoring Christ's commands is a ticket to hell, even if you "exercised faith." You should daily be in contact with His Spirit and His Word about obeying His commands and His will for your life.
Now let's look at Part II: Did the three leaders of the early church get the gospel right—which means, is it the same as Jesus’ gospel? Let’s read and see.
PETER
We’ll begin with Peter’s gospel. Acts 2:36-38 is his clear word about “how to get on the Vine” (see Part I summary last week):
“Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.” 37 Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Men and brethren, what shall we do?”38 Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."
What do they do to be saved after they were told to accept the identity of Jesus as the Christ? Repent (have a change of heart), and be baptized—the normal way to get on the Vine.
Now let’s see his gospel presentation at Acts 10:34-35:
Then Peter opened his mouth and said…35 But in every nation whoever fears Him and works righteousness is accepted by Him.
This seems to disagree with Peter's words in Acts 2 above. But Peter is simply giving the second phase of salvation: maintaining salvation through working righteously. This second phase doesn’t jibe with Luther’s “just have faith, no works necessary"--what I call "easy believism." But Peter agrees with Jesus--that's more important.
Keep in mind that God confirms Peter’s accurate presentation so that He has him open the door of the gospel to the Gentiles. Acts 10:43 says, in part:
…whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins.”
Since that’s only 8 verses away from Peter's words of “fears him and works righteousness” for salvation, this means either you have a contradiction 8 verses apart, or else… the word “believe” ALSO means that you will do whatever obedience that person you believe in says to you. Our Jesus is our Lord and King. Jesus is Lord! Bow and obey Him! Peter isn’t going to contradict himself to the same group of people. He knows the gospel better than that. So you harmonize v. 35 and 43, take them Together as necessary for salvation.
I Peter 1:13-17 says:
Therefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and rest your hope fully upon the grace that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ; 14 as obedient children, not conforming yourselves to the former lusts, as in your ignorance; 15 but as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, 16 because it is written, “Be holy, for I am holy.” 17 And if you call on the Father, who without partiality judges according to each one’s work, conduct yourselves throughout the time of your stay here in fear
Peter has the word "grace" (translated, unfortunately nowadays, as "now works necessary") with the phase "obedient children." Does that fit Luther’s model of salvation—or Jesus’ model? Note that grace, simply meaning kindness or favor, is awarded to those who are obedient—and God judges us on our works in doing that. Remember what we said in Summary Part I: If you don’t obey Christ, you don’t love Him—and that means you’re not saved. He extends favor to those who abide on Christ’s Vine—those who are faithful and obedient. (Getting on the Vine, as we saw above, involves faith and repentance—it’s just that now he’s talking about staying on the Vine.)
These works are not “trying to earn merit,” they’re works of faith, works of obedience. Which everyone on the Vine is doing, to stay on the Vine.
I Peter 4:17-18:
For the time has come for judgment to begin at the house of God; and if it begins with us first, what will be the end of those who do not obey the gospel of God? 18 Now “If the righteous one is scarcely saved, Where will the ungodly and the sinner appear?”
Note that Peter uses the word "obey" as necessary to pass the Judgment seat. Note his emphasis on fearing God. (Modern evangelistic churches avoid this tone).
II Peter 2:20-21:
For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning. 21 For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them.
Not the phrase "the latter end is worse for them than the beginning." This is clearly interpreted as losing salvation by becoming "again entangled" in the world--which we are required to avoid, in obedience to our Lord.
As we said in Part I, Luther didn’t like II Peter. You can see why—no verse speaks more clearly about the possibility of losing salvation—but that idea is not in Luther’s “gospel.” But Jesus said if we don’t bear fruit, we’ll be cut off from the Vine and thrown into the fire (John 15: 6). There are many more verses, lots more proof of Peter’s gospel agreeing with our Lord, but we have space restrictions.
JOHN
Moving to John, consider John 1:16-17:
And of His fullness we have all received, and grace for grace. 17 For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.
This seems to say that Jesus' grace replaces the law of Moses--and that seems to say that works are no longer necessary. But Scripture clearly doesn’t believe that, as we have seen. So, is Scripture contradicting itself here? No; there is a clear explanation: the Law of Moses, as Bercot explains, is Christo-Judaism that Paul is battling against--some believed that, to get on the Vine, it was necessary to be a Jew and be circumscribed. Not true; as we have seen, to get on the Vine, one must repent, and have faith in Jesus as our substitute, paying for our past sins. Paul wants to jettison their list of Jewish works to get on the Vine.
I John 2:3-5:
Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. 4 He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him.
Not knowing God is a death sentence. But not keeping His commands is that death sentence. Also note the last sentence. We are in Him, we know Him intimately (or, we are saved), how?-- by keeping His word (i.e, His commands), which perfects the love of the Spirit. And then we know that we are saved.
I John 3:10:
In this the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is he who does not love his brother.
Loving your fellow believers is one of the fruits that God expects. Note also that not practicing (thus a daily effort is expected) righteousness leaves you a child of the devil.
There are more, but space demands we move on.
JAMES
James 1:12:
Blessed is the man who endures temptation; for when he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.
Note that “approved” (a salvation word) is not guaranteed forever by your once expressing faith—but it is conditional on our enduring temptation, our practicing righteousness, as well as our faith in the work of the Lord on the cross. Salvation has two phases.
James 1:22:
But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves.
How do we deceive ourselves? By thinking we’re saved when we’re not doing the word—by not practicing obedience.
James 2:12:
So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty.
The phrase “law of liberty” is not an oxymoron, not self-contradictory. Good laws give liberty to people. Lawlessness in society is scarily restrictive on those who want order. Being freed from the bondage of Satan is freedom indeed. Note also, in his speaking to saved people, that he says WE will be judged. Many folks actually believe that Christians will escape judgment. Not the case, as this verse indicates. Our judgment will be based on whether we are speaking AND DOING what we are told, in Scripture. Agrees perfectly with Christ in Matthew 25:40ff.
James 2:14:
What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?
The last question is rhetorical, answered by the implication in “what does it profit.” The answer is “No,” that "faith" cannot save. Clearly, James is arguing that faith not followed by works does not gain us heaven. This is also made clear in James 2:24-26:
You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only. 25 Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way? 26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.
Dead means dead—no life, so no heaven. We need to be justified by God to be saved. God’s justification needs the follow-through of works.
Note that James nowhere implies that faith guarantees proper works
(that's an idea that lends itself to believing in "eternal security"--what many theologians believe). No, it takes effort, striving, words that are elsewhere in Scriptures.
James 5:19-20:
Brethren, if anyone among you wanders from the truth, and someone turns him back, 20 let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins.
Note that this says that AFTER one wanders from the truth (he was saved before, being in the truth), someone could then correct us--and see us saved--again. Yes, if you were on the Vine, you can wander away—to death of the soul (or, hell). Thus, you can lose your salvation.
Thus, we conclude: ALL THREE of these prominent Christian leaders—who were closest to Christ—agree in total to Christ’s gospel. An obedient love-faith relationship with Him is necessary to maintain salvation. James, under attack from Luther, should be particularly defended here—he had a leadership role in early Christianity—as Acts 15:13 and Galatians 2:9 show. The main point is, he praises works as essential--as how his half-brother Jesus preached it.
NEXT WEEK: DOES PAUL REALLY DISAGREE WITH JAMES?
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Escaping Hell--Faith Only? Is Works Involved? Summary of Bercot's CD "Paul vs. James" Part I
Introduction
Polls show that 85% of Americans believe they're going to heaven (ABC News Poll: December 20, 2005). Yet our behavior patterns and specific beliefs often run the opposite of Scripture. According to a May 2013 Gallup poll, 59% of Americans believe gay sexual relations are morally acceptable, 63% believe sex between an unmarried man and woman is morally acceptable, and 42% say that about abortion. But Scripture, the basis of Christianity, says none of these behaviors are morally acceptable. It seems that American “Christians” are saying fornication, sodomy, and murder are acceptable. We have to conclude that many people are calling themselves Christian, yet feel it’s OK to ignore Scripture and our Lord's commands. The problem is, a belief system that “gets me to heaven” with no sacrifice, no obedience necessary is what I call “easy believism.” But that kind of "believism" is a road to hell.
We need to be most cautious about what Scripture says to be saved. Can we really ignore Scripture, be disobedient and still escape Hell? Have we possibly deceived ourselves into assuming we're good enough for heaven, when Scripture warns us otherwise? Have we rationalized behavior that is unsupported by Scripture--and not considered the danger? Jesus, in Matthew 7:14 says:
“narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which ..leads to life, and there are few who find it."
The word "life," here, as any Biblical linguist would tell you, means "heaven." I've taken polls of my friends on the word “few,” without referencing its Scriptural source. It’s interesting how we basically agree on 6-7% of a group of people would fulfill the definition of the word. Thus, on average, only 6-7% of people are heaven-bound. That’s a long way from 85% who profess Christianity in America. Doing a little math, this says that one out of 12 or one out of 14 who call themselves Christian will make it to heaven. Do you like those odds? Another way to express that is, out of 12 people, only one is right--the other 11 are going to hell and don't know it. They are self-deceived. Do you have a desire to know for sure? Then please read this summary and then look for this CD at scrollpublishing.com.
David Bercot is a writer and lecturer on Scripture. His three books are: Will the Real Heretics Please Stand Up?; The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down; and Will the Theologians Please Sit Down? This series of CDs I'm summarizing is eye-opening, and blessed by the Holy Spirit.
Summary of David Bercot’s lecture:
Mr. Bercot is particularly zeroing in on the role of behavior, or works, in salvation; hence the title’s “Paul vs James,” since James seems to emphasize works and Paul seems to discount them and emphasize faith alone to escape hell.
Bercot points out that for most evangelical believers today, this contradiction between Paul and James is “resolved” easily: their Study Bibles and commentaries “simply explain James away.” I.e., Paul “has it right” (by ignoring works), so what James says (works are important) is ignored. Thus they cancel out James completely. Bercot doesn’t like the way they pass over the clear plain INSPIRED statements of Scripture in James. He asks, what is the real truth about this important matter of works? He calls this issue “the gospel of Jesus vs the gospel of man.” This is supremely important--heaven vs hell. Let us be drawn into this verbal fight as if our future in eternity depends upon it—as it may be!
Bercot says that most Christian denominations are ignoring Jesus' comments on what it takes to be saved. He even asserts that if we dare to speak out on what Jesus actually says about the role of works to go to heaven, modern-day evangelicals will call us “heretics.” They’ll say we’re not saved for believing that, that we’re preaching a “works salvation,” that we’re “trusting our own righteousness instead of the righteousness of Christ.” But do not be intimidated when you read the Truth from the mouth of Jesus.
Intelligent theologians had a place for works in salvation all through history—until Martin Luther introduced corrupt methodologies, which were duplicated by Calvin and Zwingli, to give the Protestant movement (emphasizing faith) an opposite twist from Catholicism (emphasizing works). Twisting Scripture right or left of the truth has been a frequent game: A group known as the Gnostics twisted Scripture in the first century, and the Catholics later did it too, coming to various non-Scriptural conclusions about how to get to heaven. And then Martin Luther did it.
The four corrupting influences put forth by Martin Luther were:
a. Relegating the key teachings of Jesus to the back closet—Jesus “didn’t teach the theology of how to be saved,” the theologians concluded. “You have to read Paul to get that.”
b. Proof texting: Establishing theological positions by picking and choosing Bible verses that fit the theology you've decided ahead of time you want to promote, and ignoring other verses that don’t fit. Most people, unfortunately, don’t read the New Testament in whole, to get the context of what is the overall picture. Your position on what it takes to be saved should be arrived at after reading the entire New Testament and fitting nearly all the relevant verses together on the subject.
c. Turning the New Testament writers into theologians, and changing their ordinary, everyday words into theological terms.
d. Making dishonest Bible translations and reference works. Remember, unlike Scripture, translations are made by humans who have their preconceptions to maintain.
Speaking of putting Jesus in the “back closet,” Christianity is the only religion or philosophy where the modern-day adherents ignore the teachings of the Founder and study the teachings of a disciple of the founder! To find out about what God says about salvation, do we go to Jesus, the God-man, the greatest Teacher who ever lived? No, we go to Paul—in Romans, for instance. This wrong focus started with the Gnostics, and somewhat with Augustine, but it became an overriding “principle” with Luther. He put a preface in front of each New Testament book, and an overall preface before the whole New Testament. His opinionated remarks (which books he favors, which books are “straw”) colored the thinking of theologians ever since. He said Romans was the “chief part of the New Testament, the very purest gospel.” (His praises of this one book are half the length of the book itself). In deciding “which are the best,” as he called it, of the New Testament books, he likes John, Paul’s books, and I Peter (but not II Peter or Matthew, Mark or Luke, the Synoptic gospels!) John’s gospel is “far, far to be preferred to the other 3” and “placed high above them.” He thus thinks we’re better off not reading the Sermon on the Mount or the Sermon on the Plain (which are only contained in the 3 Synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke)—because, Bercot suspects, their gospel by Jesus contradicts Luther’s gospel which he has made up from Paul. James he called an “epistle of straw” for “it has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it.” (Now keep in mind, reader, that God inspired ALL the books of the Bible. They are all equal because they all have something to say for our edification.)
Bercot suspects Luther liked John over the Synoptic gospels also because John uses the Greek for “believe” 99 times, vs only 9 or 10 times each in the other 3 Gospels. Verses with “believe” can be easily twisted to fit Luther’s gospel of easy believism. Luther’s favoring Paul over Jesus to make up his gospel was a direct violation of Jesus’ commandment of Matthew 23:9-10:
Do not call anyone on earth your father…10 And do not be called teachers; for One is your Teacher, the Christ.
To quote Luther: “We can know everything we need to know about Christ and the gospel without ever having heard or read the Sermon on the Mount or the rest of what Jesus said that’s not recorded in John.” The early Christians stood against that type of nonsensical thinking when the Gnostics tried to do something similar (further fascinating CDs on the Gnostics and Luther by Bercot are also available). But nobody is standing against this twisted thinking nowadays.
So let’s look at what Jesus taught on salvation from hell, for once. There are several long passages in the 4 gospels, and a hundred or more short passages, on this all-important doctrine of how to avoid hell. Let’s analyze them. We start with John 15:1-6, 10, 19:
“I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. 2 Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit He prunes, that it may bear more fruit. 3 You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you. 4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in Me. 5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned… 10 If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love…19 If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.
Key teachings of this important passage:
a. Jesus describes an ongoing, life relationship with Him as Necessary for salvation.
b. We must abide with Jesus and bear godly fruit or we’re going to be cut off the vine (i.e., on the way to hell).
c. We abide in Christ’s love ONLY if we obey His commandments.
d. Abiding, in part, means separation from the world.
Bercot asserts that of hundreds of messages he’s heard, none have used this passage when they discuss salvation. But clearly (especially in verse 6) that’s what the passage is about! In summary, in order to be saved, we must maintain an “obedient, love-faith relationship with Him.”
Doctrines of salvation taught by men today can be categorized into two groups: Either they are (1) A system that requires an obedient, love-faith relationship with Christ, or (2) Everything else—since all other systems are “equally useless” (i.e., they will leave you deceived and hell-bound if you don't read Scripture thoroughly yourself).
Some of the alternate systems of “salvation” taught by men:
a. Paul in his day fought against Christo-Judaism: It had a knowledge of Jesus as Savior and Son of God, but added that you had to follow the law of Moses in the Old Testament to be saved.
b. Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox: Sacramentalism. Receive the sacraments, attend Mass regularly, don’t die in unconfessed mortal sin, and be a loyal member of a church, to be saved.
c. Merit-ism: Live dutifully by all the commandments in the New Testament to be saved. (Relationship with Christ not necessary). Similar to (a), only New Testament, not Old.
d. Good-ism: Attend church and be a good person. That’s followed by liberals, and most Catholics, truthfully, nowadays.
e. Evangelical Protestantism: Accept Jesus as your personal Savior, have a born-again experience, believe that you’re saved by faith or grace alone, and obedience to Christ is not necessary for salvation. (Obedience is good, it's just possible to ignore it and still go to heaven. If you STRESS obedience as necessary for heaven, you’re teaching “unsound doctrine, and you’re probably not even saved.”)
None of the above 5 require an obedient, love-faith relationship with Christ. True, evangelicals stress the importance of a loving relationship with Christ, but they don't REQUIRE love as expressed in obedience (as John 15:10 clearly points out, obedience is necessary to go to heaven). Their "love" is emotion-driven, not sacrifice-driven.
Bercot stresses that, keep in mind, there are multiple thousands of people who attend churches that follow one of the 5 alternate systems above, who ALSO have a saving relationship with Him--on their own--and know His great love through sacrificial obedience.
It’s impossible to analyze “how much” obedience is necessary to be saved. That can’t be measured —relationships can’t be reduced to a formula-- and a saved person doesn’t want to measure it. We would all like perfect certainty--but with perfect certainty comes complacence.
Thus, salvation is not a one-time event of faith-and-you're-done. We must maintain (or abide with) the relationship. And the requirement to abide? Keeping His commandments. If we don’t keep His commandments, we don’t love Him. Doing that is not a task, but a loving friendship. And remember, He chose us—God first loved us before we loved Him. Salvation was originated entirely through the acceptable blood of Christ. God wants perfection, and we couldn't do that--but Christ did, as our substitute. That’s His grace. And finally the world will hate us. Not everyone all the time. But our belief system is opposite the world; they hate it--when you're speaking up against their violating a God who stood up for you--and thus rain on their selfish parade. If you don’t feel some rejection in your frequent contacts with regular people, there’s probably something you’re doing wrong.
There are past, present, and future aspects of salvation. In the past, if we at some point accepted the Lord and repented from our sin—what He is, what He did—we became attached to the Vine. “We were saved.” But--very important, we have to maintain that relationship. For the present: Are we walking in the Spirit? Then we are abiding on the Vine. It’s a breathing, ongoing relationship. A constant inflow of life-giving water drawn in from the roots of the Vine. And the future? Since our abiding produces fruit (Galatians 5:22ff), we are heaven-bound. But if we don’t produce fruit, we will be cut off from the Vine and thrown in the fire (John 15 again). Just because we’re on the Vine now doesn’t mean we’re guaranteed to be on it next year. No unconditional eternal security.
On the corruption of proof texting, we can back up any of the 5 false methodologies above with selected texts from Scripture. But we would have to shove lots of others under the rug because they don’t agree together. The key is to understand everything that Jesus says on the subject first, and then look for agreement by the other Scriptural authors--then you put it together integrally. (All the relevant New Testament verses are given in a separate PDF CD, by the way). Full weight to each verse. Not picking one author (like Paul) and ignoring others (like Jesus!).
Keep in mind that every statement made in Scripture is not the gospel in full. John 15 above, however, is a good model of the whole picture of salvation. Other statements, you’ll find, will give a piece of that, but none will make an exclusionary remark that disagrees with it. There are some unanswered questions in John 15 too that other Scripture deals with—i.e., what are the “fruit?”
Study Galatians 5 for that.
So what else does Jesus say on the subject of salvation? We can’t give them all, but here are enough to whet your interest. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5ff), look at Matthew 6:14-15:
"For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
The importance of forgiving is a godly fruit we need to possess. When we are first born again, only our PAST sins are forgiven. On a daily basis, we still need to pray forgiveness for our sins (I John 1:8, 9). But how sincere is our repentance when we don’t forgive others? See Matthew 18:23-35—note how the servant’s penalty was reinstated on him due to lack of forgiveness on his part (no eternal security there—his release from debt was conditional on his future behavior). We conclude that if we are unforgiving, we can’t be sincere in asking forgiveness.
Consider Matthew 7:21:
“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’
Their profession didn’t speak as loud as their works (works of lawlessness). Their disobedience kept them from heaven, despite their words of faith--this is easy believism.
Bercot says people have this “cop-out:” They say, “I get suggestive feelings of supernatural instructions in my head. This must be God’s commandment for me!”—but the "instructions" are in total disobedience to His written Word.
Look at Matthew 10:32:
“Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven.
Don’t forget, you can deny Him not by words only, but also by living the way of the world. You cannot have two masters. If you live the world and think only of it, you lose Christ. Stressing sacrifice of personal indulgences as part of salvation is Matthew 10:38:
And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me.
Jesus requires great commitment. Yet His yoke is light (Matthew 11:29), infused and rewarded with His love. We will joyfully lay down our lives for Him.
In Luke 16:6-9, Jesus is saying God will extend patience for us to produce fruit. But not forever. At some point, with nothing produced, the tree is cut down. It also says, He will help us, with His Spirit, to produce fruit—unless we let worldly pleasures block those efforts.
In Luke 24:46-47, repentance is necessary:
Then He said to them, “Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, 47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. /i>
In John 3:3-5, we learn that salvation begins with a New Birth. That’s what puts us “on the Vine.” We all know John 3:16 and surrounding verses. Or do we? Let’s look at “the rest of what He said,” John 3:19-21:
And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21 But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.”
Again, deeds are involved, not just belief. Your real belief can be seen in your deeds (which is what James is saying, James 2:14ff).
Two closely-related Greek words that are translated “believe:” The first word, pisteuo means to believe, trust, but it’s just mental assent. The other is peitho, sometimes translated “believe,” but other times translated “obey.” Thus, Scriptural believing is interwoven with obeying. Not just mental assent. Webster’s defines “believe” as “confidence in the statement of another.” Our level of confidence can be tested on us by God, and our response—our deeds--signifies if we truly “believe.” Thus belief and deeds are one. Do we believe Jesus when He says that we must bear fruit or else be cut off and burned? When He says that if we love Him, we will obey His commandments? Do we believe that His commandments are truly in our best interest—enough to follow them even when they don’t make sense? Our deeds will signify if we believe. One-third of the world “believes” in Christ, but Bercot suspects it’s mostly the first word—mental assent only. A ticket to hell. Remember, Jesus said only the “few” would be saved (Matthew 7:14). Can Jesus be talking about the first definition, not requiring deeds, when He says “few” would be saved, when 1/3 the world claims to be Christian? And Luke 13:24 says we must “strive” to enter heaven—that again suggests deeds are involved.
There’s an evangelism tool that says we ask the prospect, “If you die and are standing before God, and He asks, “Why should I let you in?” And if the prospect gives the “standard” answer (I’ve been good), you’re supposed to say, “No, all your works are as filthy rags; have faith in what He has done—not your works, which count nothing in salvation.” Well, it so happens that Jesus set up the same scenario in one of His sermons; He told all of us the “answer to the test” (every student’s dream)—on what basis will He let us in to heaven. He said in the Last Judgment, people will be lined up, and He will let in some people and reject other people. Did His reasons for why some were let in line up with the “Scriptural” method we just read? No; His comments were the exact opposite of what modern theologians say. In Matthew 25:34, 35 and 40, Jesus says He will separate people, in the Last Judgment—based on their deeds. He says,
Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in.. ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.
On that day, He won’t expect us to announce that our deeds mean nothing. He will be looking for deeds that show our belief is strong, and right. Once we are born again, let us strive to exercise our gifts and do the righteous deeds that will get us to heaven.
None of these teachings by Jesus disagree with our John 15 model—they harmonize with it. This is not a selection of proof texts. ALL of these clearly disagree with “salvation is by faith alone,” as Luther claimed. Works have a place. They always had a place, if you read the early church fathers (that’s Mr. Bercot’s expertise and books written.) Do you want to believe man’s gospel, or Jesus’ gospel? Where you spend your eternity may depend on it!
NEXT WEEK: IS THE JOHN 15 MODEL HARMONIZED BY THE OTHER BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT? BERCOT’S “PAUL VS JAMES”, DISC 2.
Polls show that 85% of Americans believe they're going to heaven (ABC News Poll: December 20, 2005). Yet our behavior patterns and specific beliefs often run the opposite of Scripture. According to a May 2013 Gallup poll, 59% of Americans believe gay sexual relations are morally acceptable, 63% believe sex between an unmarried man and woman is morally acceptable, and 42% say that about abortion. But Scripture, the basis of Christianity, says none of these behaviors are morally acceptable. It seems that American “Christians” are saying fornication, sodomy, and murder are acceptable. We have to conclude that many people are calling themselves Christian, yet feel it’s OK to ignore Scripture and our Lord's commands. The problem is, a belief system that “gets me to heaven” with no sacrifice, no obedience necessary is what I call “easy believism.” But that kind of "believism" is a road to hell.
We need to be most cautious about what Scripture says to be saved. Can we really ignore Scripture, be disobedient and still escape Hell? Have we possibly deceived ourselves into assuming we're good enough for heaven, when Scripture warns us otherwise? Have we rationalized behavior that is unsupported by Scripture--and not considered the danger? Jesus, in Matthew 7:14 says:
“narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which ..leads to life, and there are few who find it."
The word "life," here, as any Biblical linguist would tell you, means "heaven." I've taken polls of my friends on the word “few,” without referencing its Scriptural source. It’s interesting how we basically agree on 6-7% of a group of people would fulfill the definition of the word. Thus, on average, only 6-7% of people are heaven-bound. That’s a long way from 85% who profess Christianity in America. Doing a little math, this says that one out of 12 or one out of 14 who call themselves Christian will make it to heaven. Do you like those odds? Another way to express that is, out of 12 people, only one is right--the other 11 are going to hell and don't know it. They are self-deceived. Do you have a desire to know for sure? Then please read this summary and then look for this CD at scrollpublishing.com.
David Bercot is a writer and lecturer on Scripture. His three books are: Will the Real Heretics Please Stand Up?; The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down; and Will the Theologians Please Sit Down? This series of CDs I'm summarizing is eye-opening, and blessed by the Holy Spirit.
Summary of David Bercot’s lecture:
Mr. Bercot is particularly zeroing in on the role of behavior, or works, in salvation; hence the title’s “Paul vs James,” since James seems to emphasize works and Paul seems to discount them and emphasize faith alone to escape hell.
Bercot points out that for most evangelical believers today, this contradiction between Paul and James is “resolved” easily: their Study Bibles and commentaries “simply explain James away.” I.e., Paul “has it right” (by ignoring works), so what James says (works are important) is ignored. Thus they cancel out James completely. Bercot doesn’t like the way they pass over the clear plain INSPIRED statements of Scripture in James. He asks, what is the real truth about this important matter of works? He calls this issue “the gospel of Jesus vs the gospel of man.” This is supremely important--heaven vs hell. Let us be drawn into this verbal fight as if our future in eternity depends upon it—as it may be!
Bercot says that most Christian denominations are ignoring Jesus' comments on what it takes to be saved. He even asserts that if we dare to speak out on what Jesus actually says about the role of works to go to heaven, modern-day evangelicals will call us “heretics.” They’ll say we’re not saved for believing that, that we’re preaching a “works salvation,” that we’re “trusting our own righteousness instead of the righteousness of Christ.” But do not be intimidated when you read the Truth from the mouth of Jesus.
Intelligent theologians had a place for works in salvation all through history—until Martin Luther introduced corrupt methodologies, which were duplicated by Calvin and Zwingli, to give the Protestant movement (emphasizing faith) an opposite twist from Catholicism (emphasizing works). Twisting Scripture right or left of the truth has been a frequent game: A group known as the Gnostics twisted Scripture in the first century, and the Catholics later did it too, coming to various non-Scriptural conclusions about how to get to heaven. And then Martin Luther did it.
The four corrupting influences put forth by Martin Luther were:
a. Relegating the key teachings of Jesus to the back closet—Jesus “didn’t teach the theology of how to be saved,” the theologians concluded. “You have to read Paul to get that.”
b. Proof texting: Establishing theological positions by picking and choosing Bible verses that fit the theology you've decided ahead of time you want to promote, and ignoring other verses that don’t fit. Most people, unfortunately, don’t read the New Testament in whole, to get the context of what is the overall picture. Your position on what it takes to be saved should be arrived at after reading the entire New Testament and fitting nearly all the relevant verses together on the subject.
c. Turning the New Testament writers into theologians, and changing their ordinary, everyday words into theological terms.
d. Making dishonest Bible translations and reference works. Remember, unlike Scripture, translations are made by humans who have their preconceptions to maintain.
Speaking of putting Jesus in the “back closet,” Christianity is the only religion or philosophy where the modern-day adherents ignore the teachings of the Founder and study the teachings of a disciple of the founder! To find out about what God says about salvation, do we go to Jesus, the God-man, the greatest Teacher who ever lived? No, we go to Paul—in Romans, for instance. This wrong focus started with the Gnostics, and somewhat with Augustine, but it became an overriding “principle” with Luther. He put a preface in front of each New Testament book, and an overall preface before the whole New Testament. His opinionated remarks (which books he favors, which books are “straw”) colored the thinking of theologians ever since. He said Romans was the “chief part of the New Testament, the very purest gospel.” (His praises of this one book are half the length of the book itself). In deciding “which are the best,” as he called it, of the New Testament books, he likes John, Paul’s books, and I Peter (but not II Peter or Matthew, Mark or Luke, the Synoptic gospels!) John’s gospel is “far, far to be preferred to the other 3” and “placed high above them.” He thus thinks we’re better off not reading the Sermon on the Mount or the Sermon on the Plain (which are only contained in the 3 Synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke)—because, Bercot suspects, their gospel by Jesus contradicts Luther’s gospel which he has made up from Paul. James he called an “epistle of straw” for “it has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it.” (Now keep in mind, reader, that God inspired ALL the books of the Bible. They are all equal because they all have something to say for our edification.)
Bercot suspects Luther liked John over the Synoptic gospels also because John uses the Greek for “believe” 99 times, vs only 9 or 10 times each in the other 3 Gospels. Verses with “believe” can be easily twisted to fit Luther’s gospel of easy believism. Luther’s favoring Paul over Jesus to make up his gospel was a direct violation of Jesus’ commandment of Matthew 23:9-10:
Do not call anyone on earth your father…10 And do not be called teachers; for One is your Teacher, the Christ.
To quote Luther: “We can know everything we need to know about Christ and the gospel without ever having heard or read the Sermon on the Mount or the rest of what Jesus said that’s not recorded in John.” The early Christians stood against that type of nonsensical thinking when the Gnostics tried to do something similar (further fascinating CDs on the Gnostics and Luther by Bercot are also available). But nobody is standing against this twisted thinking nowadays.
So let’s look at what Jesus taught on salvation from hell, for once. There are several long passages in the 4 gospels, and a hundred or more short passages, on this all-important doctrine of how to avoid hell. Let’s analyze them. We start with John 15:1-6, 10, 19:
“I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. 2 Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit He prunes, that it may bear more fruit. 3 You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you. 4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in Me. 5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned… 10 If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love…19 If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.
Key teachings of this important passage:
a. Jesus describes an ongoing, life relationship with Him as Necessary for salvation.
b. We must abide with Jesus and bear godly fruit or we’re going to be cut off the vine (i.e., on the way to hell).
c. We abide in Christ’s love ONLY if we obey His commandments.
d. Abiding, in part, means separation from the world.
Bercot asserts that of hundreds of messages he’s heard, none have used this passage when they discuss salvation. But clearly (especially in verse 6) that’s what the passage is about! In summary, in order to be saved, we must maintain an “obedient, love-faith relationship with Him.”
Doctrines of salvation taught by men today can be categorized into two groups: Either they are (1) A system that requires an obedient, love-faith relationship with Christ, or (2) Everything else—since all other systems are “equally useless” (i.e., they will leave you deceived and hell-bound if you don't read Scripture thoroughly yourself).
Some of the alternate systems of “salvation” taught by men:
a. Paul in his day fought against Christo-Judaism: It had a knowledge of Jesus as Savior and Son of God, but added that you had to follow the law of Moses in the Old Testament to be saved.
b. Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox: Sacramentalism. Receive the sacraments, attend Mass regularly, don’t die in unconfessed mortal sin, and be a loyal member of a church, to be saved.
c. Merit-ism: Live dutifully by all the commandments in the New Testament to be saved. (Relationship with Christ not necessary). Similar to (a), only New Testament, not Old.
d. Good-ism: Attend church and be a good person. That’s followed by liberals, and most Catholics, truthfully, nowadays.
e. Evangelical Protestantism: Accept Jesus as your personal Savior, have a born-again experience, believe that you’re saved by faith or grace alone, and obedience to Christ is not necessary for salvation. (Obedience is good, it's just possible to ignore it and still go to heaven. If you STRESS obedience as necessary for heaven, you’re teaching “unsound doctrine, and you’re probably not even saved.”)
None of the above 5 require an obedient, love-faith relationship with Christ. True, evangelicals stress the importance of a loving relationship with Christ, but they don't REQUIRE love as expressed in obedience (as John 15:10 clearly points out, obedience is necessary to go to heaven). Their "love" is emotion-driven, not sacrifice-driven.
Bercot stresses that, keep in mind, there are multiple thousands of people who attend churches that follow one of the 5 alternate systems above, who ALSO have a saving relationship with Him--on their own--and know His great love through sacrificial obedience.
It’s impossible to analyze “how much” obedience is necessary to be saved. That can’t be measured —relationships can’t be reduced to a formula-- and a saved person doesn’t want to measure it. We would all like perfect certainty--but with perfect certainty comes complacence.
Thus, salvation is not a one-time event of faith-and-you're-done. We must maintain (or abide with) the relationship. And the requirement to abide? Keeping His commandments. If we don’t keep His commandments, we don’t love Him. Doing that is not a task, but a loving friendship. And remember, He chose us—God first loved us before we loved Him. Salvation was originated entirely through the acceptable blood of Christ. God wants perfection, and we couldn't do that--but Christ did, as our substitute. That’s His grace. And finally the world will hate us. Not everyone all the time. But our belief system is opposite the world; they hate it--when you're speaking up against their violating a God who stood up for you--and thus rain on their selfish parade. If you don’t feel some rejection in your frequent contacts with regular people, there’s probably something you’re doing wrong.
There are past, present, and future aspects of salvation. In the past, if we at some point accepted the Lord and repented from our sin—what He is, what He did—we became attached to the Vine. “We were saved.” But--very important, we have to maintain that relationship. For the present: Are we walking in the Spirit? Then we are abiding on the Vine. It’s a breathing, ongoing relationship. A constant inflow of life-giving water drawn in from the roots of the Vine. And the future? Since our abiding produces fruit (Galatians 5:22ff), we are heaven-bound. But if we don’t produce fruit, we will be cut off from the Vine and thrown in the fire (John 15 again). Just because we’re on the Vine now doesn’t mean we’re guaranteed to be on it next year. No unconditional eternal security.
On the corruption of proof texting, we can back up any of the 5 false methodologies above with selected texts from Scripture. But we would have to shove lots of others under the rug because they don’t agree together. The key is to understand everything that Jesus says on the subject first, and then look for agreement by the other Scriptural authors--then you put it together integrally. (All the relevant New Testament verses are given in a separate PDF CD, by the way). Full weight to each verse. Not picking one author (like Paul) and ignoring others (like Jesus!).
Keep in mind that every statement made in Scripture is not the gospel in full. John 15 above, however, is a good model of the whole picture of salvation. Other statements, you’ll find, will give a piece of that, but none will make an exclusionary remark that disagrees with it. There are some unanswered questions in John 15 too that other Scripture deals with—i.e., what are the “fruit?”
Study Galatians 5 for that.
So what else does Jesus say on the subject of salvation? We can’t give them all, but here are enough to whet your interest. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5ff), look at Matthew 6:14-15:
"For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
The importance of forgiving is a godly fruit we need to possess. When we are first born again, only our PAST sins are forgiven. On a daily basis, we still need to pray forgiveness for our sins (I John 1:8, 9). But how sincere is our repentance when we don’t forgive others? See Matthew 18:23-35—note how the servant’s penalty was reinstated on him due to lack of forgiveness on his part (no eternal security there—his release from debt was conditional on his future behavior). We conclude that if we are unforgiving, we can’t be sincere in asking forgiveness.
Consider Matthew 7:21:
“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’
Their profession didn’t speak as loud as their works (works of lawlessness). Their disobedience kept them from heaven, despite their words of faith--this is easy believism.
Bercot says people have this “cop-out:” They say, “I get suggestive feelings of supernatural instructions in my head. This must be God’s commandment for me!”—but the "instructions" are in total disobedience to His written Word.
Look at Matthew 10:32:
“Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven.
Don’t forget, you can deny Him not by words only, but also by living the way of the world. You cannot have two masters. If you live the world and think only of it, you lose Christ. Stressing sacrifice of personal indulgences as part of salvation is Matthew 10:38:
And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me.
Jesus requires great commitment. Yet His yoke is light (Matthew 11:29), infused and rewarded with His love. We will joyfully lay down our lives for Him.
In Luke 16:6-9, Jesus is saying God will extend patience for us to produce fruit. But not forever. At some point, with nothing produced, the tree is cut down. It also says, He will help us, with His Spirit, to produce fruit—unless we let worldly pleasures block those efforts.
In Luke 24:46-47, repentance is necessary:
Then He said to them, “Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, 47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. /i>
In John 3:3-5, we learn that salvation begins with a New Birth. That’s what puts us “on the Vine.” We all know John 3:16 and surrounding verses. Or do we? Let’s look at “the rest of what He said,” John 3:19-21:
And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21 But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.”
Again, deeds are involved, not just belief. Your real belief can be seen in your deeds (which is what James is saying, James 2:14ff).
Two closely-related Greek words that are translated “believe:” The first word, pisteuo means to believe, trust, but it’s just mental assent. The other is peitho, sometimes translated “believe,” but other times translated “obey.” Thus, Scriptural believing is interwoven with obeying. Not just mental assent. Webster’s defines “believe” as “confidence in the statement of another.” Our level of confidence can be tested on us by God, and our response—our deeds--signifies if we truly “believe.” Thus belief and deeds are one. Do we believe Jesus when He says that we must bear fruit or else be cut off and burned? When He says that if we love Him, we will obey His commandments? Do we believe that His commandments are truly in our best interest—enough to follow them even when they don’t make sense? Our deeds will signify if we believe. One-third of the world “believes” in Christ, but Bercot suspects it’s mostly the first word—mental assent only. A ticket to hell. Remember, Jesus said only the “few” would be saved (Matthew 7:14). Can Jesus be talking about the first definition, not requiring deeds, when He says “few” would be saved, when 1/3 the world claims to be Christian? And Luke 13:24 says we must “strive” to enter heaven—that again suggests deeds are involved.
There’s an evangelism tool that says we ask the prospect, “If you die and are standing before God, and He asks, “Why should I let you in?” And if the prospect gives the “standard” answer (I’ve been good), you’re supposed to say, “No, all your works are as filthy rags; have faith in what He has done—not your works, which count nothing in salvation.” Well, it so happens that Jesus set up the same scenario in one of His sermons; He told all of us the “answer to the test” (every student’s dream)—on what basis will He let us in to heaven. He said in the Last Judgment, people will be lined up, and He will let in some people and reject other people. Did His reasons for why some were let in line up with the “Scriptural” method we just read? No; His comments were the exact opposite of what modern theologians say. In Matthew 25:34, 35 and 40, Jesus says He will separate people, in the Last Judgment—based on their deeds. He says,
Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in.. ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.
On that day, He won’t expect us to announce that our deeds mean nothing. He will be looking for deeds that show our belief is strong, and right. Once we are born again, let us strive to exercise our gifts and do the righteous deeds that will get us to heaven.
None of these teachings by Jesus disagree with our John 15 model—they harmonize with it. This is not a selection of proof texts. ALL of these clearly disagree with “salvation is by faith alone,” as Luther claimed. Works have a place. They always had a place, if you read the early church fathers (that’s Mr. Bercot’s expertise and books written.) Do you want to believe man’s gospel, or Jesus’ gospel? Where you spend your eternity may depend on it!
NEXT WEEK: IS THE JOHN 15 MODEL HARMONIZED BY THE OTHER BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT? BERCOT’S “PAUL VS JAMES”, DISC 2.
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Exact Date of Christ's Crucifixion Proved by Scripture and Stars (Part II of Stars CD)
Can we know the exact day when Christ died? Yes.
The Sabbath, Saturday, was a day in which no real work is to be done. Jeremiah 17:22 says:
…nor carry a burden out of your houses on the Sabbath day, nor do any work, but hallow the Sabbath day, as I commanded your fathers. That means they had to double-gather the previous day, Friday. Thus Friday was the day of Preparation. As it so happens, all four Gospels record Jesus’ death on Preparation day, so He was crucified on Friday. (Matthew 27:62, Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54, and John 19:14). Friday was also accepted by the earliest church fathers and scholars through the ages.*
A second clue: Jesus is crucified on Passover day. John 18:28-29 says:
Then they led Jesus from Caiaphas to the Praetorium, and it was early morning. But they themselves did not go into the Praetorium, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover. 29 Pilate then went out to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this Man?”
This is important. Passover is on the 14th of Nisan, a specific date in a Hebrew month. So that means, of course, its day of the week changes year-to-year. But we now know that Jesus was crucified in a year in which Passover, Nisan 14, is on Friday. That narrows the field.
A third clue: As you can see in the previous paragraph, Jesus was crucified when Pilate ruled. Scholars have no trouble giving the years: AD 26-36.
A fourth clue: Luke 3:23 records that Jesus was “about 30 years of age” when He began His ministry. John records Jesus attending 3 Passovers: 2:23, 6:4, and 13:1. This narrows the field further (assuming birth in 2 BC, see my "Birth of Jesus" blog) to Jesus being crucified in the early 30s AD.
Nisan 14 happens on Friday only twice during this time period: 4/7/30 and 4/3/33. Which is it?
To get the final answer, oddly, we turn our attention to Sejanus, an extreme anti-Semite ruler over Pilate for awhile. Pilate, to conform to his wishes, did terribly brutal things to Jews. He did everything he could to tick them off. But Sejanus was assassinated 10/18/31 AD, along with many of his appointees (but not Pilate). Then, Pilate’s new leader had an opposite approach to the Jews: “Leave the Jews alone.” Pilate, to conform to this, to save his skin, had to be careful not to appear cruel. Here’s the question: Since Pilate was ambivalent toward Jesus (John 19:12), which leader was he under? Pilate couldn’t have been under Sejanus, so it must be that Jesus was crucified after his death, 10/18/31. Of our two possible dates above, we now have only one choice:
Jesus was crucified on April 3, 33 AD
Maybe you’re thinking “That year selection seems sketchy, perhaps it was the other date and Pilate was just feeling good, or he wanted to give Sejanus a hard time.” Well--there are lots more confirming evidence about the date we chose—typical of the Bible’s layering of proofs, its unassailable accuracy. We can nail down the year another way: check Daniel 9:25-26:
Know therefore and understand, That from the going forth of the command To restore and build Jerusalem Until Messiah the Prince, There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks… 26 “And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off…
First off, the word “weeks” is incorrect—the Hebrew word is “sevens.” But seven what—days, months? If you make a week 7 years, then “seven weeks” becomes 7x7 years, or 49 years, and “62 weeks” becomes 62x7, or 434 years. Then you get “from the going forth of the command…until Messiah there shall be 49+434, or 483 years…and after (that), Messiah shall be “cut off”-- killed.
Then you need to know that the Jewish people had a 360-day lunar calendar, vs our 365.24 day solar one. So from the king's “command” to the killing of Messiah is 483 x 360/365.24=476 of our years. The command to restore and build Jerusalem came under the 20th year of Artaxerxes (Nehemiah 2:1-6). Historical books confirm this as 444 BC. Adding 476 years (there is no year between 1BC and 1 AD), you get 33 AD!
You’re still not convinced? Here’s a proof where the sky comes in. Kepler proved (see, again, our "Birth" blog) that the sky is absolutely predictable. Now note darkness in His crucifixion. In Mathew 27:45:
Now from the sixth hour until the ninth hour there was darkness over all the land.
Changing Roman time to our time, this means darkness from noon to 3 pm—so 3 pm was when Jesus died (Matt 27:46-50), as soon as darkness ended.
Now turn to Acts 2:20, 22,and 31, where Peter, on the Day of Pentecost, only 10 days after Jesus had been ascended into heaven after His resurrection, quotes a prophecy in Joel 2:30 about the Anointed One—and then makes some intriguing remarks:
“The sun shall be turned into darkness, And the moon into blood…” Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through Him in your midst, as you yourselves also know—he, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ
He is thus saying this prophecy has already happened--and that they had seen these signs, the darkness AND the “blood moon”—which is a lunar eclipse. In such an eclipse, the sun, the moving earth, and the moon are lined up (briefly while the earth passes by) so that the moon only gets sunlight around the edges of the earth, but refracted through the earth’s atmosphere. The moon, from the earth, takes on an eerie redness. Jesus died when the moon was red. This would’ve spooked everyone (along with the graves being opened, and “zombies” walking about—oh, yeah—Matthew 27:52). So Peter is reminding everyone of this creepy event. Odd that the Gospels don’t record the blood moon, but this quote by Peter definitely proved it happened at His crucifixion. Evidently no one in the audience accused him of lying that those events actually happened.
Well, as it so happens--There was a blood moon on 4/3/33! (For an analysis of how we can know the exact day, see my comments in the "Birth" blog). Thank You, God, for your incredible accuracy. Wise men follow the Lord. At the very same time Jesus died, Jewish priests were sacrificing innocent lambs to be eaten at Passover. This was no coincidence; it was in the plan of God. Jesus was our Lamb, voluntary sacrificed and given to the hand of Satan for our sins.
Also at this time, the moon is back in Virgo (the Virgin), at her foot. But instead of being new, as in birth (see our comments in "Birth" blog), it is full. Jesus led a life fully lived—but then blotted out in blood.
What you can’t miss in all this, is an unassailable fact: from the moment our omniscient God flung the stars out in space, He positioned them knowing that there would be a redemptive plan that we would need to approach Him because of our sin. He knew then that His very own Son would have to die. His power then raised Him in Resurrection like He can raise us again—if we believe and follow His commands. He left His love letter to us, His Word, the Bible. It is perfect in its accuracy, as we have seen here, as perfect as God is in His grace. Let us read His Words to us to learn how we can avoid Hell and make it to Heaven. Scripture says that most people go to Hell (Matthew 7:14). His Word is the way to life in heaven.
(PS: Some of these proofs are not on DVD, but in the “study” section on bethlehemstar.com.
* In case some of you are still scratching your head about Jesus spending 3 days in the tomb, when He was crucified on Friday and resurrected on Sunday, there is a simple answer. Who said He had to spend 3 days in the tomb? Matthew 12:40 says For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. Translators might have failed us here. The phrase “in the heart of the earth” doesn’t speak of the tomb—it speaks of in the core of Satan’s grasp (the word "earth" has been mistranslated). I’m using the reputed W.E. Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. The Greek word for “heart” isn’t “inside.” He says “the word (heart) came to stand for man’s entire mental and moral activity…the Bible describes human depravity as in the ‘heart,’ because sin is a principle which has its seat in the center of man’s inward life, and then defiles the whole circuit of his action.” Citing Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies.
Secondly, the word “earth” doesn’t speak of burial. Quoting Vine’s again: “the earth (is) the world..where the context suggests the earth as a place characterized by…weakness.” (Does the crucifixion of this Man suggest our weakness? Definitely.) Remember, Jesus had dodged their capture time and time again, saying “my time has not yet come.” But in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus emphasized something else: Then he came to the disciples and said, “Sleep now and take your rest . . . The time has come! I am into the hands of evil men! (TLB)
This is saying, Jesus gave Himself over to Satan on Thursday at the Garden. He was in Satan’s wicked hands from Thursday until Sunday morning suffering and paying for our sin. (He suffered much before the Cross). Thus He was in the heart of the earth’s wickedness for 3 days…and nights, just as Jonah was under the sway of the big fish for 3 days. (P.S. This lengthy note is not from Prof. Larson, but from Amazingfacts.org).
The Sabbath, Saturday, was a day in which no real work is to be done. Jeremiah 17:22 says:
…nor carry a burden out of your houses on the Sabbath day, nor do any work, but hallow the Sabbath day, as I commanded your fathers. That means they had to double-gather the previous day, Friday. Thus Friday was the day of Preparation. As it so happens, all four Gospels record Jesus’ death on Preparation day, so He was crucified on Friday. (Matthew 27:62, Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54, and John 19:14). Friday was also accepted by the earliest church fathers and scholars through the ages.*
A second clue: Jesus is crucified on Passover day. John 18:28-29 says:
Then they led Jesus from Caiaphas to the Praetorium, and it was early morning. But they themselves did not go into the Praetorium, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover. 29 Pilate then went out to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this Man?”
This is important. Passover is on the 14th of Nisan, a specific date in a Hebrew month. So that means, of course, its day of the week changes year-to-year. But we now know that Jesus was crucified in a year in which Passover, Nisan 14, is on Friday. That narrows the field.
A third clue: As you can see in the previous paragraph, Jesus was crucified when Pilate ruled. Scholars have no trouble giving the years: AD 26-36.
A fourth clue: Luke 3:23 records that Jesus was “about 30 years of age” when He began His ministry. John records Jesus attending 3 Passovers: 2:23, 6:4, and 13:1. This narrows the field further (assuming birth in 2 BC, see my "Birth of Jesus" blog) to Jesus being crucified in the early 30s AD.
Nisan 14 happens on Friday only twice during this time period: 4/7/30 and 4/3/33. Which is it?
To get the final answer, oddly, we turn our attention to Sejanus, an extreme anti-Semite ruler over Pilate for awhile. Pilate, to conform to his wishes, did terribly brutal things to Jews. He did everything he could to tick them off. But Sejanus was assassinated 10/18/31 AD, along with many of his appointees (but not Pilate). Then, Pilate’s new leader had an opposite approach to the Jews: “Leave the Jews alone.” Pilate, to conform to this, to save his skin, had to be careful not to appear cruel. Here’s the question: Since Pilate was ambivalent toward Jesus (John 19:12), which leader was he under? Pilate couldn’t have been under Sejanus, so it must be that Jesus was crucified after his death, 10/18/31. Of our two possible dates above, we now have only one choice:
Jesus was crucified on April 3, 33 AD
Maybe you’re thinking “That year selection seems sketchy, perhaps it was the other date and Pilate was just feeling good, or he wanted to give Sejanus a hard time.” Well--there are lots more confirming evidence about the date we chose—typical of the Bible’s layering of proofs, its unassailable accuracy. We can nail down the year another way: check Daniel 9:25-26:
Know therefore and understand, That from the going forth of the command To restore and build Jerusalem Until Messiah the Prince, There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks… 26 “And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off…
First off, the word “weeks” is incorrect—the Hebrew word is “sevens.” But seven what—days, months? If you make a week 7 years, then “seven weeks” becomes 7x7 years, or 49 years, and “62 weeks” becomes 62x7, or 434 years. Then you get “from the going forth of the command…until Messiah there shall be 49+434, or 483 years…and after (that), Messiah shall be “cut off”-- killed.
Then you need to know that the Jewish people had a 360-day lunar calendar, vs our 365.24 day solar one. So from the king's “command” to the killing of Messiah is 483 x 360/365.24=476 of our years. The command to restore and build Jerusalem came under the 20th year of Artaxerxes (Nehemiah 2:1-6). Historical books confirm this as 444 BC. Adding 476 years (there is no year between 1BC and 1 AD), you get 33 AD!
You’re still not convinced? Here’s a proof where the sky comes in. Kepler proved (see, again, our "Birth" blog) that the sky is absolutely predictable. Now note darkness in His crucifixion. In Mathew 27:45:
Now from the sixth hour until the ninth hour there was darkness over all the land.
Changing Roman time to our time, this means darkness from noon to 3 pm—so 3 pm was when Jesus died (Matt 27:46-50), as soon as darkness ended.
Now turn to Acts 2:20, 22,and 31, where Peter, on the Day of Pentecost, only 10 days after Jesus had been ascended into heaven after His resurrection, quotes a prophecy in Joel 2:30 about the Anointed One—and then makes some intriguing remarks:
“The sun shall be turned into darkness, And the moon into blood…” Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through Him in your midst, as you yourselves also know—he, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ
He is thus saying this prophecy has already happened--and that they had seen these signs, the darkness AND the “blood moon”—which is a lunar eclipse. In such an eclipse, the sun, the moving earth, and the moon are lined up (briefly while the earth passes by) so that the moon only gets sunlight around the edges of the earth, but refracted through the earth’s atmosphere. The moon, from the earth, takes on an eerie redness. Jesus died when the moon was red. This would’ve spooked everyone (along with the graves being opened, and “zombies” walking about—oh, yeah—Matthew 27:52). So Peter is reminding everyone of this creepy event. Odd that the Gospels don’t record the blood moon, but this quote by Peter definitely proved it happened at His crucifixion. Evidently no one in the audience accused him of lying that those events actually happened.
Well, as it so happens--There was a blood moon on 4/3/33! (For an analysis of how we can know the exact day, see my comments in the "Birth" blog). Thank You, God, for your incredible accuracy. Wise men follow the Lord. At the very same time Jesus died, Jewish priests were sacrificing innocent lambs to be eaten at Passover. This was no coincidence; it was in the plan of God. Jesus was our Lamb, voluntary sacrificed and given to the hand of Satan for our sins.
Also at this time, the moon is back in Virgo (the Virgin), at her foot. But instead of being new, as in birth (see our comments in "Birth" blog), it is full. Jesus led a life fully lived—but then blotted out in blood.
What you can’t miss in all this, is an unassailable fact: from the moment our omniscient God flung the stars out in space, He positioned them knowing that there would be a redemptive plan that we would need to approach Him because of our sin. He knew then that His very own Son would have to die. His power then raised Him in Resurrection like He can raise us again—if we believe and follow His commands. He left His love letter to us, His Word, the Bible. It is perfect in its accuracy, as we have seen here, as perfect as God is in His grace. Let us read His Words to us to learn how we can avoid Hell and make it to Heaven. Scripture says that most people go to Hell (Matthew 7:14). His Word is the way to life in heaven.
(PS: Some of these proofs are not on DVD, but in the “study” section on bethlehemstar.com.
* In case some of you are still scratching your head about Jesus spending 3 days in the tomb, when He was crucified on Friday and resurrected on Sunday, there is a simple answer. Who said He had to spend 3 days in the tomb? Matthew 12:40 says For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. Translators might have failed us here. The phrase “in the heart of the earth” doesn’t speak of the tomb—it speaks of in the core of Satan’s grasp (the word "earth" has been mistranslated). I’m using the reputed W.E. Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. The Greek word for “heart” isn’t “inside.” He says “the word (heart) came to stand for man’s entire mental and moral activity…the Bible describes human depravity as in the ‘heart,’ because sin is a principle which has its seat in the center of man’s inward life, and then defiles the whole circuit of his action.” Citing Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies.
Secondly, the word “earth” doesn’t speak of burial. Quoting Vine’s again: “the earth (is) the world..where the context suggests the earth as a place characterized by…weakness.” (Does the crucifixion of this Man suggest our weakness? Definitely.) Remember, Jesus had dodged their capture time and time again, saying “my time has not yet come.” But in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus emphasized something else: Then he came to the disciples and said, “Sleep now and take your rest . . . The time has come! I am into the hands of evil men! (TLB)
This is saying, Jesus gave Himself over to Satan on Thursday at the Garden. He was in Satan’s wicked hands from Thursday until Sunday morning suffering and paying for our sin. (He suffered much before the Cross). Thus He was in the heart of the earth’s wickedness for 3 days…and nights, just as Jonah was under the sway of the big fish for 3 days. (P.S. This lengthy note is not from Prof. Larson, but from Amazingfacts.org).
Thursday, March 5, 2015
Exact Month of Jesus' Birth Predicted by the Stars--and What Happened on December 25?
People tend to scoff at this Biblical record of the star of Bethlehem, saying “this star is doing things a star cannot do.” They’re likely referring to Matthew 2:9:
When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was.
“How does a star “stand over,”or stop,” people say. So they assume this story is a fable. Well, science has the answer to that question. Of course,if we can "prove" it, they would ask “Why do you think you can introduce some new facts now, when we haven’t heard anything convincing in all of history?” Science has a reason for that too.
A little background: The author of the CD this is taken from is Professor Larson--but he is a lawyer, not a reputed scientist. But he was interested in astronomy—movements of stars and planets and constellations. (Not the same as astrology, which is often abused as predictive, often telling you how to run your life). Scripture praises astronomy: it insists the stars tell us things from God. But Scripture condemns astrology. Note Job 9:9:
He (God) made the Bear, Orion, and the Pleiades, And the chambers of the south.
And note Psalm 19:1-2:
The heavens declare the glory of God…2 Day unto day utters speech, And night unto night reveals knowledge.
Thus, the stars communicate. God wants us to study the heavens to see what He might announce or tell us. Prof. Larson found Biblical proof that left his class agog (see also his website, bethlehemstar.net), and God blessed his impact so that he is now requested to speak even overseas on this subject. Now you’ll surely ask, “Why isn’t he supported by reputable scientists?” Well, why do most of our scientific minds believe in evolution instead of creationism? And what happens to scientists who believe in creationism? They often don’t get promoted, and they have no world-class media outlet (which are owned by non-Christian money). The fact is: The world’s basic fundamental “truths” are anti-God. If those in power are rational, why did they kill Jesus?
Final background: Johannes Kepler in 1619 discovered the math behind the movements of the solar system. With hundreds of hours of effort, he could map how the sky appeared on any date, past or future, since all movements of everything in the sky are predictable. But the effort required was ponderous for math and science geniuses of his generation. Now we have the advent of computers; so these movements have been incorporated into software programs. How the sky will appear from any location on the planet for any given date can now be found in seconds—in fact, the computer can even animate their movements through a period of time. So we are only now able to answer the big question: “Which of them is the star of Bethlehem—if any?” There are, it is estimated, 100 billion galaxies, and 100 billion stars in each—how can you find the Bethlehem star in such a crowd?
Here is the relevant Bible passage, Matthew 2:1-9, from which we will draw necessary characteristics for the Bethlehem star:
Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, 2 saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” 3 When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. 4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. 5 So they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: 6 ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Are not the least among the rulers of Judah; For out of you shall come a Ruler Who will shepherd My people Israel.’” 7 Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared. 8 And he sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him, bring back word to me, that I may come and worship Him also.” 9 When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was.
From these verses, the Star of Bethlehem has to fulfill 9 qualifications:
a. Has to indicate birth (2:2)
b. Has to indicate Kingship ( 2:2)
c. Has to be Jewish (2:1)
d. Rising in east (2:2)
e. Appears at an exact time
f. Herod didn’t know when it appeared ( 2:3)
g. Endured over a considerable period of time (2:2, 9)
h. Went ahead of magi as they traveled south to Bethlehem ( 2:9)
i. The star has to Stop! Over Bethlehem ( 2:9)
It couldn’t be a meteor, which doesn’t rise in the east, and it isn’t long-lasting. It couldn’t be a comet because omens are perceived as foretelling doom. But Jesus’ birth is good news. Also, there were no comets in 3-2 BC (those were the conception/birthdate, see below). It couldn’t be a nova—a spectacular exploding star--Herod wouldn’t ask “when”—his scientific advisors (who may also have been astrologers) would’ve told him—along with their “interpretation.” Also, there were no novas for 3-2BC.
Based on what we just excluded, and from (f) above, the “right star” wasn’t spectacular—but it must have been moderately bright. It so happens, a conjunction of planets, or planet/star, would fulfill that. Let’s look at Jupiter, the King Planet (as it is so-called—and, it is the largest in the planet system). If Jupiter is involved, it would help us meet requirement (b) above as well. As it so happens, Jupiter, the King planet, was conjoined to Regulus (the King Star, how “coincidental”) in September of 3 BC. Since a magus had likely seen this 2-3 times before (this conjunction happens every 12 years), that by itself is not a big enough deal to get the Magi to pack up their camels and travel. Nor is it a big enough deal for Herod to hear from his scientific advisors.
A scientific note here: planets sometimes reverse (“retrograde”) motion (like passing a car on the freeway, it seems to move backward, so when earth swings past a planet, that planet seems to move backward). It so happens, Jupiter is in retrograde in 3-2BC in a very peculiar path—it passes Regulus, then reverses course, passes again, then reverses course, passes a 3rd time! This would have been exciting by itself, but additionally, if you draw this movement, it forms a halo above Regulus. Thus we have a triple-proof coronation of a king! (King planet, king star, and halo). Item “b” above is definitely solved, and we have a base star for further study.
Now, what about Jewishness--(c) above? A little Scriptural background: Gen 49:9 says, in summary, (1) out of tribe of Judah would come a King of all kings. (2) Judah is compared to a lion. Well, why not look and see if anything is happening in the constellation Leo the Lion? Further, look at Revelation 12:1-5, a “great sign appeared in heaven;” a woman “clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet,” who was pregnant and due to bear a child “to rule all nations with a rod of iron.” She is threatened by a dragon wanting to kill her child. This is, of course, about Jesus and the Virgin Mary—and opposed by a dragon--Satan working through Herod. It So Happens that as Jupiter begins to crown Regulus, this event happens in the constellation Leo—and behind Leo is—guess what—the constellation Virgo (Virgin). And Virgo is rising, clothed in the sun. The moon at the time (within September, 3 BC, see below) is new, so it was under her (Virgo’s) feet! An amazing prophecy come true in many "coincidental" points! You must see the DVD to appreciate this amazing point!
As it turns out, this was the Conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit. How do we know? Because 9 months later, Jupiter is finished crowning Regulus; and has moved to conjoin with Venus, making the brightest conjunction in the world (planetariums love to show this conjunction). This was the only time in those magi’s lifetime for this conjunction. If the magi were thinking about all the activity just noted from September, this combo practically screamed out, “Mount Up!”
Thus, Jesus was born in June, 2 BC.Yes, it "should have been" 0 BC/AD. Medieval scientists were good, but not that good.
And the magi began planning a trip.
The next several months are speculative, as opposed to the Keplerian rock-hard scientific facts above. Let’s assume the magi were, within a few months, starting their trip. We’re assuming the magi, from the East, were located at Babylon, a home base for the best astronomers. After a couple more months, they would arrive at Jerusalem asking “where?” They tell Herod the details about September, 3 BC and June, 2 BC, then get sent south to Bethlehem—only 5 miles away, please note that.
It So Happens that in December of 2 BC (thus allowing 6 months from Christ’s birth to their arrival at Jerusalem), Jupiter is in the sky south of them from Jerusalem-- thus it continues leading them toward Bethlehem.
This means 8 of 9 requirements above are fulfilled:
a.The first conjunction signified birth by its association with Virgo “birthing” the new moon at her feet (in the tradition of the day, a woman typically gave birth downward).
b.The Planet of King’s halo-coronation of the Star of Kings signified kingship.
c.The triple conjunction began with the Jewish New Year and took place within Leo the Lion, showing a connection with the Jewish tribe of Judah (and prophecies of the Jewish Messiah).
d.Jupiter rises in the east.
e.The conjunctions appeared at precise, identifiable times.
f.Herod was unaware of these things; they were astronomical events which had significance only when explained by experts.
g.The planet/star events took place over a span of time sufficient for the Magi to see them both from the East and upon their arrival in Jerusalem.
h.Jupiter was ahead of the Magi as they traveled south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem
But Jupiter somehow stopped, since it stayed over Bethlehem for the time they traveled there. (This is what brings the scoffers out). As it so happens, when a planet (or star) goes to the end of an arc and begins to retrograde, it has to “stop” briefly. (Picture an elliptical arc, say the outline of the end of an egg, and the egg is standing up—as you draw this in your mind, from the left, the arc, or egg outline, is moving down. At the right, it moves upward. But for a brief period, at the bottom, it isn’t moving up or moving down—so it seems to stop). It So Happens that Jupiter was “at the bottom”—just before retrograde, it “stopped”—and that day was December 25, BC 2! That must’ve been the date of their arrival to the toddler Jesus, in the house. That’s a Significant date—not for the birth (by which we mistakenly celebrate it), but for the celebration of worship and presenting gifts to Our Lord.
Thank You, God, that your planets, stars, and constellations speak of Your great Immanuel! With perfect prediction. Jews knew the night sky well (they had no light pollution, no real air pollution, they slept on their roofs a lot—knew the constellations).
NEXT WEEK: THE EXACT DATE OF THE CRUCIFIXION OF CHRIST—FROM THE STARS.
When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was.
“How does a star “stand over,”or stop,” people say. So they assume this story is a fable. Well, science has the answer to that question. Of course,if we can "prove" it, they would ask “Why do you think you can introduce some new facts now, when we haven’t heard anything convincing in all of history?” Science has a reason for that too.
A little background: The author of the CD this is taken from is Professor Larson--but he is a lawyer, not a reputed scientist. But he was interested in astronomy—movements of stars and planets and constellations. (Not the same as astrology, which is often abused as predictive, often telling you how to run your life). Scripture praises astronomy: it insists the stars tell us things from God. But Scripture condemns astrology. Note Job 9:9:
He (God) made the Bear, Orion, and the Pleiades, And the chambers of the south.
And note Psalm 19:1-2:
The heavens declare the glory of God…2 Day unto day utters speech, And night unto night reveals knowledge.
Thus, the stars communicate. God wants us to study the heavens to see what He might announce or tell us. Prof. Larson found Biblical proof that left his class agog (see also his website, bethlehemstar.net), and God blessed his impact so that he is now requested to speak even overseas on this subject. Now you’ll surely ask, “Why isn’t he supported by reputable scientists?” Well, why do most of our scientific minds believe in evolution instead of creationism? And what happens to scientists who believe in creationism? They often don’t get promoted, and they have no world-class media outlet (which are owned by non-Christian money). The fact is: The world’s basic fundamental “truths” are anti-God. If those in power are rational, why did they kill Jesus?
Final background: Johannes Kepler in 1619 discovered the math behind the movements of the solar system. With hundreds of hours of effort, he could map how the sky appeared on any date, past or future, since all movements of everything in the sky are predictable. But the effort required was ponderous for math and science geniuses of his generation. Now we have the advent of computers; so these movements have been incorporated into software programs. How the sky will appear from any location on the planet for any given date can now be found in seconds—in fact, the computer can even animate their movements through a period of time. So we are only now able to answer the big question: “Which of them is the star of Bethlehem—if any?” There are, it is estimated, 100 billion galaxies, and 100 billion stars in each—how can you find the Bethlehem star in such a crowd?
Here is the relevant Bible passage, Matthew 2:1-9, from which we will draw necessary characteristics for the Bethlehem star:
Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, 2 saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” 3 When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. 4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. 5 So they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: 6 ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Are not the least among the rulers of Judah; For out of you shall come a Ruler Who will shepherd My people Israel.’” 7 Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared. 8 And he sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him, bring back word to me, that I may come and worship Him also.” 9 When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was.
From these verses, the Star of Bethlehem has to fulfill 9 qualifications:
a. Has to indicate birth (2:2)
b. Has to indicate Kingship ( 2:2)
c. Has to be Jewish (2:1)
d. Rising in east (2:2)
e. Appears at an exact time
f. Herod didn’t know when it appeared ( 2:3)
g. Endured over a considerable period of time (2:2, 9)
h. Went ahead of magi as they traveled south to Bethlehem ( 2:9)
i. The star has to Stop! Over Bethlehem ( 2:9)
It couldn’t be a meteor, which doesn’t rise in the east, and it isn’t long-lasting. It couldn’t be a comet because omens are perceived as foretelling doom. But Jesus’ birth is good news. Also, there were no comets in 3-2 BC (those were the conception/birthdate, see below). It couldn’t be a nova—a spectacular exploding star--Herod wouldn’t ask “when”—his scientific advisors (who may also have been astrologers) would’ve told him—along with their “interpretation.” Also, there were no novas for 3-2BC.
Based on what we just excluded, and from (f) above, the “right star” wasn’t spectacular—but it must have been moderately bright. It so happens, a conjunction of planets, or planet/star, would fulfill that. Let’s look at Jupiter, the King Planet (as it is so-called—and, it is the largest in the planet system). If Jupiter is involved, it would help us meet requirement (b) above as well. As it so happens, Jupiter, the King planet, was conjoined to Regulus (the King Star, how “coincidental”) in September of 3 BC. Since a magus had likely seen this 2-3 times before (this conjunction happens every 12 years), that by itself is not a big enough deal to get the Magi to pack up their camels and travel. Nor is it a big enough deal for Herod to hear from his scientific advisors.
A scientific note here: planets sometimes reverse (“retrograde”) motion (like passing a car on the freeway, it seems to move backward, so when earth swings past a planet, that planet seems to move backward). It so happens, Jupiter is in retrograde in 3-2BC in a very peculiar path—it passes Regulus, then reverses course, passes again, then reverses course, passes a 3rd time! This would have been exciting by itself, but additionally, if you draw this movement, it forms a halo above Regulus. Thus we have a triple-proof coronation of a king! (King planet, king star, and halo). Item “b” above is definitely solved, and we have a base star for further study.
Now, what about Jewishness--(c) above? A little Scriptural background: Gen 49:9 says, in summary, (1) out of tribe of Judah would come a King of all kings. (2) Judah is compared to a lion. Well, why not look and see if anything is happening in the constellation Leo the Lion? Further, look at Revelation 12:1-5, a “great sign appeared in heaven;” a woman “clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet,” who was pregnant and due to bear a child “to rule all nations with a rod of iron.” She is threatened by a dragon wanting to kill her child. This is, of course, about Jesus and the Virgin Mary—and opposed by a dragon--Satan working through Herod. It So Happens that as Jupiter begins to crown Regulus, this event happens in the constellation Leo—and behind Leo is—guess what—the constellation Virgo (Virgin). And Virgo is rising, clothed in the sun. The moon at the time (within September, 3 BC, see below) is new, so it was under her (Virgo’s) feet! An amazing prophecy come true in many "coincidental" points! You must see the DVD to appreciate this amazing point!
As it turns out, this was the Conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit. How do we know? Because 9 months later, Jupiter is finished crowning Regulus; and has moved to conjoin with Venus, making the brightest conjunction in the world (planetariums love to show this conjunction). This was the only time in those magi’s lifetime for this conjunction. If the magi were thinking about all the activity just noted from September, this combo practically screamed out, “Mount Up!”
Thus, Jesus was born in June, 2 BC.Yes, it "should have been" 0 BC/AD. Medieval scientists were good, but not that good.
And the magi began planning a trip.
The next several months are speculative, as opposed to the Keplerian rock-hard scientific facts above. Let’s assume the magi were, within a few months, starting their trip. We’re assuming the magi, from the East, were located at Babylon, a home base for the best astronomers. After a couple more months, they would arrive at Jerusalem asking “where?” They tell Herod the details about September, 3 BC and June, 2 BC, then get sent south to Bethlehem—only 5 miles away, please note that.
It So Happens that in December of 2 BC (thus allowing 6 months from Christ’s birth to their arrival at Jerusalem), Jupiter is in the sky south of them from Jerusalem-- thus it continues leading them toward Bethlehem.
This means 8 of 9 requirements above are fulfilled:
a.The first conjunction signified birth by its association with Virgo “birthing” the new moon at her feet (in the tradition of the day, a woman typically gave birth downward).
b.The Planet of King’s halo-coronation of the Star of Kings signified kingship.
c.The triple conjunction began with the Jewish New Year and took place within Leo the Lion, showing a connection with the Jewish tribe of Judah (and prophecies of the Jewish Messiah).
d.Jupiter rises in the east.
e.The conjunctions appeared at precise, identifiable times.
f.Herod was unaware of these things; they were astronomical events which had significance only when explained by experts.
g.The planet/star events took place over a span of time sufficient for the Magi to see them both from the East and upon their arrival in Jerusalem.
h.Jupiter was ahead of the Magi as they traveled south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem
But Jupiter somehow stopped, since it stayed over Bethlehem for the time they traveled there. (This is what brings the scoffers out). As it so happens, when a planet (or star) goes to the end of an arc and begins to retrograde, it has to “stop” briefly. (Picture an elliptical arc, say the outline of the end of an egg, and the egg is standing up—as you draw this in your mind, from the left, the arc, or egg outline, is moving down. At the right, it moves upward. But for a brief period, at the bottom, it isn’t moving up or moving down—so it seems to stop). It So Happens that Jupiter was “at the bottom”—just before retrograde, it “stopped”—and that day was December 25, BC 2! That must’ve been the date of their arrival to the toddler Jesus, in the house. That’s a Significant date—not for the birth (by which we mistakenly celebrate it), but for the celebration of worship and presenting gifts to Our Lord.
Thank You, God, that your planets, stars, and constellations speak of Your great Immanuel! With perfect prediction. Jews knew the night sky well (they had no light pollution, no real air pollution, they slept on their roofs a lot—knew the constellations).
NEXT WEEK: THE EXACT DATE OF THE CRUCIFIXION OF CHRIST—FROM THE STARS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)